Seeking advice on Self Study Curriculum

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around self-studying physics and the selection of appropriate curriculum materials. Participants explore various textbooks and video lectures, sharing their thoughts on the effectiveness and challenges of different resources in the context of learning mechanics, electromagnetism, and relativity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests starting with Kleppner & Kolenkow for mechanics, Purcell for electricity and magnetism, and supplementary materials like the Feynman Lectures, questioning if these would prepare them for Sommerfeld and Landau & Lifshitz.
  • Another participant emphasizes the value of video lectures from reputable institutions, recommending specific courses on classical physics, quantum physics, electromagnetism, and relativity, while also affirming the proposed book list.
  • A participant reiterates the challenge of K&K and Purcell, advising not to get discouraged by difficulties and to focus on problem-solving, while also mentioning the potential to skip to Goldstein and Landau if mathematical proficiency is sufficient.
  • There is a mention of physics books aimed at mathematicians by authors like Arnold and Spivak, suggesting alternative approaches to learning physics.
  • One participant points out a broken link to the video lectures and provides a corrected link, along with additional information about the relativity lecture's instructor.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the value of the proposed textbooks and video lectures, but there are differing opinions on the necessity of certain texts and the appropriate progression through the material. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal path for self-study.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the prerequisites for advanced texts and the effectiveness of different learning resources, highlighting the subjective nature of self-study approaches.

Humanlimits
Messages
6
Reaction score
5
I'm usually entirely autonomous in planning out my curriculum (and have read much great advice here in aid); but my physics curriculum is proving more difficult to plan out than my math curriculum.

I was thinking as a start: Kleppner & Kolenkow Mechanics, Purcell Electricity and Magnetism, and AP French for Waves/Relativity; probably read along with the Feynman Lectures concurrently. I was wondering if after completely going through the aforementioned texts, if the Sommerfeld lectures on physics would be enough to make Landau & Lifshitz accessible.

There's also the angle I've read from a UChicago page suggesting if I'm proficient enough at math there's not much reason to read anything besides Goldstein and then Landau (for mechanics alone). Then of course there are those sort of physics for mathematicians books by people like Arnold and Spivak.

I enjoy reading a variety of books on a subject, and understand well the value of practice, but also want to make sure my time is spent wisely.

all advice is appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I will not give reference to books, but I will give reference to some very good video lectures. They are authentic, and are extremely good. All professors are either from IITs (Indian Institutes of Technology), IISc (Indian Institute of Science) or IISERs (Indian Institutes of Science Education and Research).

All lectures are coordinated by NPTEL (National Program on Technology Enhanced Learning).

Following are the list of some good lectures:

Classical Physics by Prof. V. Balakrishnan.

Quantum Physics (if you need it later) by V. Balakrishnan

Introductory Electromagnetism by Prof. Manoj Harbola

Oscillations and Waves by V. Balakrishnan

Special Theory of Relativity

The books that you've mentioned are also very good and the plan looks okay to me. Always keep Feynman lectures handy.
 
Humanlimits said:
I was thinking as a start: Kleppner & Kolenkow Mechanics, Purcell Electricity and Magnetism, and AP French for Waves/Relativity; probably read along with the Feynman Lectures concurrently.

This sounds like a good plan. As I'm sure you've read at some point, K&K and Purcell are known for being challenging even though they're technically intro books, so I feel it's worth reiterating that you shouldn't get discouraged if you find yourself really struggling or sinking several hours into a problem. That is to be expected. The most important thing is to make sure you work all of the problems. Don't be afraid to post here for help when you're stuck.

Humanlimits said:
There's also the angle I've read from a UChicago page suggesting if I'm proficient enough at math there's not much reason to read anything besides Goldstein and then Landau (for mechanics alone). Then of course there are those sort of physics for mathematicians books by people like Arnold and Spivak.

Definitely stick to your first plan. These are graduate level books and shouldn't even be in question at this stage.
 
Wrichik Basu said:
I will not give reference to books, but I will give reference to some very good video lectures. They are authentic, and are extremely good. All professors are either from IITs (Indian Institutes of Technology), IISc (Indian Institute of Science) or IISERs (Indian Institutes of Science Education and Research).

All lectures are coordinated by NPTEL (National Program on Technology Enhanced Learning).

Following are the list of some good lectures:

Classical Physics by Prof. V. Balakrishnan.

Quantum Physics (if you need it later) by V. Balakrishnan

Introductory Electromagnetism by Prof. Manoj Harbola

Oscillations and Waves by V. Balakrishnan

Special Theory of Relativity

The books that you've mentioned are also very good and the plan looks okay to me. Always keep Feynman lectures handy.

First link is broken.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K