Advice regarding sled experiment

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rlosey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment Force
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around designing an experiment to compare different sled designs and assess how these designs affect the force required to pull a sled over a distance of 100 meters on a flat frozen lake bed. The focus includes theoretical considerations of friction and practical measurement techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant mentions having sleds built with a proposed load of 75 kg and a flat testing surface, indicating familiarity with traditional Indigenous sled designs but limited physics experience.
  • Another participant explains the concepts of static and kinetic friction, noting that the force required to move the sled will differ before and after it starts moving, and emphasizes the importance of measuring sustained force.
  • There is a suggestion that the angle at which the sled is pulled can affect the force required, with an optimum angle depending on the coefficient of friction.
  • A participant raises the challenge of obtaining quantitative data from the experiment and suggests a method involving two people releasing sleds simultaneously to measure sliding distance as a way to compare sleds.
  • Another participant highlights the need to consider the interaction between the sled, the pulling source, and the bridle geometry, as well as logging surface composition and temperature.
  • One participant proposes using a spring balance (fish scale) to measure the force needed to pull the sled, while also noting the importance of maintaining a constant speed during the tests.
  • A later reply agrees with the use of a spring balance but stresses the necessity of ensuring consistent sled speed to avoid fluctuating measurements.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the methods and factors affecting sled performance, with no clear consensus on the best approach or measurement technique. Multiple competing views remain regarding the optimal experimental setup and the significance of different variables.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the sled designs and environmental conditions, as well as the dependence on the definitions of friction coefficients. There are unresolved questions about the practicality of measuring forces accurately in the experimental setup.

rlosey
Messages
2
Reaction score
2
Hello. I would like to design an experiment where different sled designs are compared. Specifically, I would like to asses how sled design affects the amount of force required to pull a sled over 100 meters. Any suggestions you might have would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What research have you done so far? What have you found out? What is your level of scientific knowledge?
 
I have the sleds built. The proposed load for each sled is 75 kg. I also have a relatively flat surface to test the sled on--a flat frozen lake bed. The idea is to test traditional Indigenous sled designs, which I am very familiar with. However, I have nearly no physics experience.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK and Dale
rlosey said:
I have the sleds built. The proposed load for each sled is 75 kg. I also have a relatively flat surface to test the sled on--a flat frozen lake bed. The idea is to test traditional Indigenous sled designs, which I am very familiar with. However, I have nearly no physics experience.
There are two aspects to the force required to move a sled across ice. There is a coefficient of static friction, which determines the initial force required to get the sled moving. Once the sled is moving, there is a coefficient of kinetic friction which determines the force required to keep the sled moving at constant speed. The kinetic friction will be lower than the static friction.

In summary, you'll need an initial higher force to get the sled moving and then a lower, sustained constant force to keep the slep moving at constant speed. The sustained force is probably the one you want. The distance is irrelevant. That simply determines for how long the force must be maintained.

There will be an optimum angle above the horizontal at which to pull the sled. This depends on the coefficient of friction. For a low coefficient of friction, the optimum angle will be only slightly above the horizontal. However, if the static friction is quite high, you may find it's easier to pull the sled slightly upwards initially until you get it sliding. This might be something that you've picked up naturally. In any case, there is an optimum angle which requires the minimum force to pull each sled.

This itself could be used as a test. The better the sled is at sliding, then lower the angle at which it feels natural to pull it.

The tricky part is, of course, to get any quantitative data from an experiment on the ice. Otherwise, you are relying on your senses to determine which is easer to pull. There's no obvious way to rig up equipment that would give you any output in terms of a force.

One approach to calculating the coefficient of kinetic friction would be to get the sled moving at some constant speed and then see how long it takes to slow down and stop. If there is no equipment, an experiment could be done with two people. You get both sleds moving at the same speed and then release them at the same time. Then measure how far they slide before stopping. For a direct comparison between two sleds, you don't need any data.

If you know the starting speed and the stopping time and/or distance, you can calculate the coefficient of friction from that.
 
Wouldn't a spring balance (fish scale) give a reasonable measurement of the force needed to pull the sled?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
sandy stone said:
Wouldn't a spring balance (fish scale) give a reasonable measurement of the force needed to pull the sled?
That was my thought as well. But, you also need to consider the pulling angle and the constancy of the sled speed, as @PeroK mentioned. You will need to come up with a mechanism to ensure the speed is constant and the same between tests. I'm envisioning that the rope is wrapped around a drum that turns at a fixed speed, or something like that. If the sled speed is not constant, the spring scale reading will bounce around.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
739
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K