Eotvos Exp: Gravitational v Inertial Mass Equivalence

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ranku
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the Eotvos experiment, which investigates the equivalence of gravitational and inertial mass. Participants explore the distinctions between gravitational, centrifugal, and centripetal forces, and how these relate to the experiment's setup and interpretation.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the Eotvos experiment tests the equivalence between gravitational and centrifugal force, while others argue it tests the equivalence between gravitational and centripetal force.
  • A participant notes that centrifugal force is a fictitious force, and its cancellation with gravitational force would require the masses to be in gravitational freefall, whereas centripetal force is a real force requiring the masses to not be in freefall.
  • Another participant questions whether measuring centrifugal force is equivalent to measuring centripetal force, suggesting that if they are equal by construction, the distinction may not matter.
  • One participant expresses confusion over conflicting descriptions in a textbook and a wiki article regarding the forces involved in the experiment.
  • A participant cites a passage from a textbook that describes how gravitational force can balance centripetal acceleration due to Earth's rotation, leading to a discussion about the interpretation of forces in different frames of reference.
  • Another participant suggests that the phrasing in the textbook could be improved to clarify the relationship between centripetal and centrifugal forces in the context of the experiment.
  • Participants discuss the relevant forces in terms of their interplay with gravitational force, noting differences in inertial and rotating frames.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether the Eotvos experiment involves centrifugal or centripetal force, with multiple competing views remaining. The discussion reflects uncertainty and differing interpretations of the forces involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the ambiguity in terminology and the need for clarity regarding the definitions and roles of centrifugal and centripetal forces in the context of the Eotvos experiment.

Ranku
Messages
434
Reaction score
18
The Eotvos experiment tests the equivalence of gravitational and inertial mass. Some descriptions state that the experiment tests the equivalence between gravitational and centrifugal force, while others state that it is between gravitational and centripetal force. There is a significant difference between the two: Centrifugal force is a fictitious force, like inertial force, and its cancellation with gravitational force would require that the two masses in the torsion balance must be effectively in gravitational freefall. Centripetal force is a real force, and its balancing would require that the two masses not be in freefall and experience the gravitational force. So does the experiment involve centrifugal or centripetal force?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ranku said:
The Eotvos experiment tests the equivalence of gravitational and inertial mass. Some descriptions state that the experiment tests the equivalence between gravitational and centrifugal force, while others state that it is between gravitational and centripetal force. There is a significant difference between the two: Centrifugal force is a fictitious force, like inertial force, and its cancellation with gravitational force would require that the two masses in the torsion balance must be effectively in gravitational freefall. Centripetal force is a real force, and its balancing would require that the two masses not be in freefall and experience the gravitational force. So does the experiment involve centrifugal or centripetal force?
If you set out to measure centrifugal force, how would you go about it?

You could set up a rotating coordinate system and an apparatus that is rotating along with the coordinate system. You could verify the rotation rate, the axis of rotation and the displacement of a test object from that axis. You could then use a strain gauge to determine the centripetal force required to hold the test object stationary relative to the apparatus.

Having done this, are you measuring centripetal force or centrifugal force? Six of one, half dozen of the other. If the two are equal by construction, it does not matter which one you think you are measuring.
 
Ranku said:
The Eotvos experiment tests the equivalence of gravitational and inertial mass.
Yes
Ranku said:
Some descriptions state that the experiment tests the equivalence between gravitational and centrifugal force, while others state that it is between gravitational and centripetal force.
Both is not quite accurate. It's about the ratio of inertial forces (here centrifugal) versus the ratio of gravitational forces.
Ranku said:
Centrifugal force is a fictitious force, like inertial force, and its cancellation with gravitational force...
They aren't cancelling. Read the wiki and look at the diagram:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eötvös_experiment
 
A.T. said:
They aren't cancelling. Read the wiki and look at the diagram:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eötvös_experiment
After reading in the textbook that centripetal force is involved, I got confused reading in wiki that centrifugal force is involved. That's why I asked for clarification, how can both be correct?
 
Ranku said:
After reading in the textbook that centripetal force is involved, I got confused reading in wiki that centrifugal force is involved. That's why I asked for clarification, how can both be correct?
"Is involved" is very vague. What does it say exactly?
 
A.T. said:
"Is involved" is very vague. What does it say exactly?
This is the passage from the book Gravity by Hartle (pp.108):
Imagine two masses of different material at the ends of a rod that is suspended from a fibre in a laboratory on the surface of the earth. Because the laboratory is rotating with the Earth, the hanging fibre is not exactly aligned with the local force of gravity. Rather, the fibre hangs at a small angle to that direction so that a small component of the gravitational force can balance the centripetal acceleration arising from the Earth's rotation.
The masses are free to move in the direction perpendicular to both the fibre and the rod. Gravity is the only force acting in the 'twisting direction' along which the masses effectively freefalling. Any difference between the accelerations of the two masses would cause the pendulum to twist. Thus, a difference in the equality of their gravitational and inertial masses could be detected.
 
Ranku said:
This is the passage from the book Gravity by Hartle (pp.108):
... a small component of the gravitational force can balance the centripetal acceleration arising from the Earth's rotation...
This would be better stated as: "... can provide the centripetal force ..." and is equivalent to saying: " ... can balance the centrifugal force ...", just described from the inertial frame, instead of the rotating frame.
 
A.T. said:
This would be better stated as: "... can provide the centripetal force ..." and is equivalent to saying: " ... can balance the centrifugal force ...", just described from the inertial frame, instead of the rotating frame.
So what's the relevant force in terms of interplay with the gravitational force - is it the centripetal or centrifugal force?
 
Ranku said:
So what's the relevant force in terms of interplay with the gravitational force - is it the centripetal or centrifugal force?
Inertial frame: Gravity component provides centripetal force
Rotating frame: Gravity component balances centrifugal force
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K