Aether Experiments: What's Your Take?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter user1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Aether Experiments
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the validity of two experiments related to aether theories, specifically whether these experiments can provide evidence against certain aether models. Participants explore the implications of the experiments and their methodologies.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the clarity of the experiments' objectives, suggesting they focus on the properties of aether rather than its existence.
  • Another participant critiques the experimental design, arguing that the use of a mercury barometer to create a vacuum does not effectively exclude aether, which they describe as being treated like a material substance.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the experiments' ability to contribute meaningfully to the discussion on aether theories.
  • A request for published references is made, indicating a preference for credible sources over personal websites.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the validity or implications of the experiments. There are competing views regarding the nature of aether and the effectiveness of the proposed experimental setups.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of published references for the experiments discussed, which affects the credibility of the claims made. Additionally, assumptions about the properties of aether and its interaction with materials remain unresolved.

user1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
What are your opinions about these two experiments described at: http://adsind.wordpress.com? Can they be used to reject some of the aether theories?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have a published reference? (A personal website is not an acceptable reference.)
 
No. The experiments are posted only on that website. I was interested to know what people on these forums think about the experiments.
 
I get the impression that the person who wrote that is not even clear what the question is. Both of those experiments seem to be aimed at determining, not whether the "aether" exists but whether it has properties, such as pressure, etc. of material "objects". It seems to me that most, if not all, physicists today accept that "light" is a wave in the electro-magnetic field so that the "either", not any material substance.
 
"The cavity created inside the piston system should be free of aether since we assumed that aether does not pass through high density metals. We assume that the entire system is perfectly built and sealed so that there is no gap between exterior of the cube and the inside cavity. The cavity can be better sealed from the exterior if we submerse the entire piston system into mercury."

The author uses a mercury barometer to create a "vacuum" which excludes the aether ... because the aether cannot pass through heavy metals.

No, I don't think that this would accomplish any of the stated goals. Most of the "writing" is simply a detailed description of how to build a not-so-good vacuum chamber. The author seems to view the "aether" as a liquid or gas which can be excluded from here, or captured there ...

I suggest you read this instead: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aether_theories
 
That should answer your question. I am locking this thread because there is not a published reference for this experiment.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
7K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K