Age of Universe: Is There an Alternate Perception?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of the age of the universe and how it may be perceived differently by observers in various gravitational contexts, particularly near black holes. Participants explore theoretical implications of general relativity and the effects of gravity and velocity on time perception.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that observers near massive objects, like black holes, would experience a different perception of the universe's age compared to those at rest relative to the Hubble flow.
  • One participant suggests that an observer hovering just outside a black hole's event horizon could perceive the universe as very young, with no limit on how young it could appear.
  • Another participant argues that immediately after the expansion of the universe, conditions were likely uniform radiation rather than the presence of black holes, indicating a timeline for black hole formation.
  • There is a claim that observations of time are relative and depend on the observer's velocity and local gravitational potential, with all observations being equally valid.
  • A participant raises a hypothetical scenario about traveling into a black hole and returning to find the universe at a different age, questioning the implications of such travel.
  • Counterarguments are presented regarding the nature of black holes, including the assertion that nothing can "come out" of a black hole and challenging the idea that anything inside travels faster than light.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of time and observation near black holes, with no consensus reached on the validity of certain claims regarding black hole behavior and the implications for the age of the universe.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of time and observation, as well as unresolved questions about the conditions immediately following the universe's expansion and the formation of black holes.

Holland
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I was wondering if, immediately following the expansion of the universe there might have been objects of matter with immense gravity like that of a black hole. For the observer on such an object that still exists, what would the age of the universe be?

You could substitue this with an object that formed 1 billion years after tbb. Wouldnt their observation be dramatically different yet equally valid?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The age of the universe as usually discussed is for an observer who is at rest relative to the average motion of the matter and radiation in the universe (the "Hubble flow"), and is in the context of homogeneous models, which wouldn't include any structure such as black holes, etc. Yes, you're right, different observers can measure different ages of the universe on their clocks. You can't be "on" a black hole, but an observer hovering just outside a black hole's event horizon would say that according to her clock, the universe is very young. There is no limit on how young the universe could be according to such an observer. The same applies to an observer moving at nearly the speed of light relative to the Hubble flow.
 
...immediately following the expansion of the universe there might have been objects of matter with immense gravity like that of a black hole.

you mean right after inflation ended...Actually it is far more likely everything back then was rather uniform radiation...it has taken gravity some time to form black holes...but crowells's reply covers many circumstances nicely.

Observed time passes differently according to the observer's velocity and local gravitational potential. Only the speed of light is constant for all inertail observers; most everything else depends on the frame of reference used...observations, in general, are relative, one as equally valid as another.
 
An observer on such an object would have traveled backwards in time and would look at the universe being younger when he comes out of the hole, as anything inside a black hole travels faster than light, because black holes are shortcuts through space.
But what I say is impossible when this happens, imagine a guy entering a black hole when the universe is x years old, when he comes back if he had traveled 2x years backward, were would he be?
 
when he comes out of the hole,

Nothing "comes out"...according to our best understanding.

"as anything inside a black hole travels faster than light, because black holes are shortcuts through space..."

untrue.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
5K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K