Undergrad Age Slower or Faster in Center of Earth? Time Dilation Explored

  • Thread starter Thread starter diseasedrat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Age Center Earth
Click For Summary
In the context of time dilation at the Earth's center, it is theorized that one would age slower compared to someone on the surface due to the effects of gravitational potential. While gravitational force decreases as one approaches the center, the warping of spacetime is more significant there, leading to slower aging from an external observer's perspective. However, the actual time experienced by someone at the center would feel normal to them, as their clocks would tick regularly. The discussion clarifies that the gravitational potential, not just the force, is crucial for understanding time dilation. Overall, the consensus is that time dilation effects within Earth's gravity well are minimal compared to extreme environments like neutron stars.
diseasedrat
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
theoretically if you were in the center of the earth, would you age slower or faster from time dilation?

this question is asked here as well:

https://www.quora.com/Can-someone-c...km-deep-cave-How-much-longer-would-my-life-be

scott soloway said:
It would actually be shorter. While the net gravitational force initially increases as you go deeper, eventually it starts to decrease. At your chosen depth you are at about .2 Earth radii from the center and the gravitational force is less than half of its value at the surface. In addition, your velocity would be quite a bit less further speeding up time.

this is a wrong answer right?

although you would gravitationally "feel" less pull on yourself in the center of the Earth - however, technically, since you're closer to more mass, what you call space-time would be more warped in the center of the Earth than on the surface of the earth, so you should age slower in the center of the Earth right?

has time dilation ever been tested deeper in the Earth before?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preliminary_reference_Earth_model - just a link for reference, etc

thanks 4 answers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Deep inside the Earth or any other large gravity well,
you would appear to age more slowly if you could be observed by somebody outside if it.
Time would seem to be passing as usual to you though according to whatever clocks you have available.
However the gravity well of Earth is not enough to cause impressive time dilation.
You need to be inside a neutron star for things to start looking significantly time distorted.
That is not an experiment to be recommended.
 
diseasedrat said:
theoretically if you were in the center of the earth, would you age slower or faster from time dilation?
Slower than what, or faster than what?
 
A clock that was stationary at the center of the Earth would tick more slowly than a clock that was stationary on the surface of the Earth.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
diseasedrat said:
this is a wrong answer right?

Yes, it certainly is. In fact almost everything said in that quora thread is actually irrelevant to the question; what they are calling "gravitational potential" there is actually the "acceleration due to gravity", which is the gradient (slope) of the potential. But time dilation depends on the potential itself, which continues to get lower from the surface of the Earth all the way down to the center. So pervect's answer is correct.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
MOVING CLOCKS In this section, we show that clocks moving at high speeds run slowly. We construct a clock, called a light clock, using a stick of proper lenght ##L_0##, and two mirrors. The two mirrors face each other, and a pulse of light bounces back and forth betweem them. Each time the light pulse strikes one of the mirrors, say the lower mirror, the clock is said to tick. Between successive ticks the light pulse travels a distance ##2L_0## in the proper reference of frame of the clock...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K