Air flow differance.Square versus round tubing

In summary: If you are using a stock air tube, it is most likely round. If you are adding a new air tube, it is most likely square. Reynolds number is not a big factor in this decision.
  • #1
rich849
5
0
Hello.I am trying to make a snorkel for my 4x4 truck.I would like to use 2 1/2 inch square tubing but all snorkel manufactures use round.My dad says round flows more air.I believe round must be better.But I want to no why?I now I can get more mass or volume per square inch in a square tube at 2 1/2 inch versus a round at 2 1/2 inches so why/how doese this change when I start to move the air through the tube?Doese it change if the tube is straight?Any info or recomendation's to help me understand this would be great please keep in mind I am not very educated at all.So if you could try to keep it simple it would be easier for me to understand.Thank you.

My truck's stock air tube is 2 and 3/4 inches round. The system I am adding will be one straight piece.Will 2 1/2 square get me the same cfm as 2 3/4 round?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #3
Pardon a bit of hand waving. In a circular crossection tube the speed of material through the tube is lowest near the sides due to drag. The speed increases as you move away from the edges with highest speeds in the center. This results in a parabolic speed profile.

Now in a square tube the regions near a corner are influenced by 2 sides so the speed will be even slower there. As you move away from the sides a speed profile much like a circular tube will develope. What you will end up with is that the majority of the material will be flowing in a circular region inside the square. The concludion would be why pay for and carry around the corners, they do not flow nearly as much flow as the center region.

(opps I am on a different computer then usual, do not have a spell checker installed. Will check this post later. Apologies)
 
  • #4
Thank's for the help.I do not no how to do that math for Reynold's # and don't even no how the get the info needed to get my sister to calculate it for me.Like friction velocity etc.But I do kinda understand it a little better.I tried to find a illustration of air flow through round and square tube.I have had no luck.But it sound's like the air swirls longways if the air in the center moves faster then the edges.This is making sense now.Awsome.I would really like to use the square tube still for look's and to be differant.Can you guy's give me a rough guess as to how much difference in flow there is.I could live with Around 5% or 10% but if it's 15 or 20% I need to change my plan's.

P.S. thank you for being nice and offering help to me even though I cannot spell and lack so much knowledge.I have posted on other forum's for other stuff and peapole are rude and just harrase me instead of offering any help.So thank's again and happy Holloween
 
  • #5
Hydraulic diameter is given by the equation Dh=4A/U
Where for square tube:
A=L2
U=4L
So hydraulic diameter for a square tube is Dh = L. In other words, a square tube has the same hydraulic diameter as the same sized round pipe so the flow restriction between the two will be the same. Make it out of either square or round. You shouldn't notice the difference.

Edit: I should also mention that square and round tube is generally specified by specifying the characteristic length as measured from the outside, not the inside. Pipe of a given diameter on the other hand, does not have an OD equal to the characteristic dimension, it is always larger. 21/2" pipe has an OD of 2.875, so the ID will be larger than the 21/2" square tube. It's the internal dimension you are concerned about, not the outside dimension. If the two have the same internal dimension, they will flow the same.
 
Last edited:
  • #6
Thank you everyone.Tomarrow or the next day I will begin building it and give the square tube a shot.I look forward to talking to you all again on the next project.If you have any info to add please feel free anytime.
 
  • #7
The Does it REALLY matter?

No - if the tube has the same cross sectional area and it's clean inside, and it is only a few meters long.

Yes - if the tube is smaller in cross sectional area, it has dags and intrusions into the tube and it's many meters long - like 100 or 200 meters...The car engine moves low amounts of air with a low pressure differential.

The ONLY real time that these are issues are with very high pressures, high velocities - in the kinds of things you get in liquid fuel rocket engines etc..

People use round steel tube etc., because it's cheap, light, easy to weld, all the fittings are common off the shelf gear or easy to make or adapt.Get a vacuum cleaner, hook it up and make up a simple manometer to test the difference - if you can get tubes with the same or nearly the same cross sectional area - and then modify the equation to adjust the results.
 
  • #8
Chill.

You are making a snorkel, not designing a fighter pilot.
1) 2.5" Square tubing will sustain more capacity than the round stock because it has a greater cross-sectional area.
2) If you are making your own snorkel, I imagine you don't have a "performance" truck. You aren't fine tuning anything. The snorkel will have about the same if not greater intake capacity than the stock air intake depending on where it is located.
3) Why use steel? Plastic works the same and is lighter and easier to fasten to the vehicle. Steel will be rough on the mounts when you are bouncing around in mud and water.
 
Last edited:
  • #9
Hey Iron-Stein.You are right.I had to fabricate my square with to piece's at 90's.The round would have ben much easier to get.Great idea with the vacume.Those kind of home made test's are more my speed.Thank you.

Travis-King I agree doesn't have to be exact.It's not a space shuttle lol.And the square let's me keep cross section smaller then round because the square edges get me more volume.(if it's to big it will impair my field of view)I leaned to the safe side with my calculated size so 2 1/2 should be slightly extra if anything.My truck is sort of fine tuned, highly modified so I don't want to hurt any performance.They do not make a snorkel for my truck because the motor in it is not factory.Otherwise yah I would have used something lab tested.I used metal because I can cut weld grind paint etc..I said its one straight piece for simplicity to my post but really it's more complex and has some water traps I intergrated in it.To separate water and snow.I will take a pic later and try to post it.So you all can see what your time has went into.Thank's again everyone.
 
  • #10
Sorry for taking so long.This is what it look's like.It work's great no problems yet.Thank you everyone for the help.I have gotten some criticism and some complements on how it look's.Honestly I am not completley satisfied with the look's.I might change it.Feel free to comment on it good or bad.I like the honest input.Have a great day everyone.
 

Attachments

  • snorkel 004.jpg
    snorkel 004.jpg
    71.4 KB · Views: 1,225
  • snorkel 019.jpg
    snorkel 019.jpg
    67.8 KB · Views: 1,277

1. What is the difference between square and round tubing in terms of air flow?

The main difference between square and round tubing is their cross-sectional shape. Square tubing has a flat surface area, while round tubing is circular. This difference in shape can affect the flow of air through the tubing.

2. Which type of tubing is better for air flow?

It depends on the specific application and the design of the tubing system. Generally, round tubing is more efficient for air flow as it creates less resistance and turbulence compared to square tubing. However, square tubing may be more suitable for certain applications that require a specific shape or larger surface area for heat transfer.

3. How does the shape of tubing affect air flow?

The shape of tubing can impact air flow in several ways. Square tubing has more surface area, which can create more resistance and turbulence in the air flow. This can result in decreased efficiency and increased energy consumption. On the other hand, round tubing has a smoother surface and produces less resistance and turbulence, allowing for more efficient air flow.

4. Can the same amount of air flow be achieved with both square and round tubing?

Yes, it is possible to achieve the same amount of air flow with both square and round tubing. However, round tubing may require less energy and have a more efficient flow compared to square tubing. This is because round tubing has a smaller perimeter for the same cross-sectional area, resulting in less resistance and turbulence.

5. Are there any other factors besides shape that can affect air flow in tubing?

Yes, there are other factors that can impact air flow in tubing, such as the material of the tubing, the length and diameter of the tubing, and any obstructions or bends in the tubing. These factors can create resistance and turbulence, affecting the overall efficiency of air flow through the tubing system.

Similar threads

  • General Engineering
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • General Engineering
Replies
11
Views
6K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • General Engineering
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
6
Views
256
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
95
Views
4K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
10
Views
562
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
3
Views
463
Replies
9
Views
6K
Back
Top