Aircraft Carrier: Dynamics Question #4 | Find Acceleration & Retarding Force

  • Thread starter Thread starter looi76
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dynamics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the acceleration required to bring a 20-tonne airplane to a complete stop on a 100-meter runway aboard an aircraft carrier. The calculations reveal that an acceleration of -32 m/s² is necessary. Additionally, the required retarding force is calculated to be -2.9 million Newtons. A participant points out a potential error in the mass conversion from tonnes to kilograms, suggesting that the mass should be 20,000 kg instead of 90,000 kg.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematic equations, specifically v² = u² + 2as
  • Knowledge of Newton's second law, F = m.a
  • Ability to convert units, particularly from tonnes to kilograms
  • Familiarity with basic physics concepts related to motion and forces
NEXT STEPS
  • Review kinematic equations for motion under constant acceleration
  • Study unit conversion techniques, especially for mass
  • Explore practical applications of Newton's laws in aviation and engineering
  • Investigate the dynamics of landing aircraft on moving platforms like aircraft carriers
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, aerospace engineers, and anyone interested in the dynamics of aircraft landing procedures.

looi76
Messages
80
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An aeroplane of mass 20 tonne lands on an aircraft carrier with a horizontal velocity of 80ms^{-1}. A 100m runway is available.
(a) What must be the acceleration to bring the aeroplane to rest safely?
(b) What retarding force is requires?

Homework Equations


v^2 = u^2 + 2as
F = m.a

The Attempt at a Solution


m = 90 \times 10^3kg \ , \ v = 80ms^{-1} \ , \s = 100m

(a) v^2 = u^2 + 2as
0^2 = 80^2 + 2 \times a \times 100
-80^2 = 200a
a = \frac{-80^2}{200}
a = -32ms^{-2}

(b) F = m.a
F = 90 \times 10^3 \times -32
F = -2.9 \times 10^6 N

Are my answers correct?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi looi76,

I think your mass for the airplane is incorrect. Am I misunderstanding your numbers? How did you get 90000 kg?
 
Check your conversion factors for tonne to kilograms.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
5K