Airsoft - range and energy question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Range
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the physics of airsoft, specifically comparing the range and energy of BBs of different masses when shot from an airsoft gun. The original poster poses a question about whether a lighter BB (0.2g) or a heavier BB (0.4g), both having the same energy, would travel further.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between mass, energy, and range, questioning how these factors influence the distance a BB travels. There are comparisons made to arrows and discussions about the effects of drag on the BBs' flight.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various participants offering insights and considerations regarding the physics involved. Some suggest that the lighter BB may travel further due to higher initial velocity, while others raise concerns about the impact of drag and terminal velocity on the actual range.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that this discussion is not related to homework or coursework, and there is an emphasis on conducting experimental tests to validate theoretical assumptions.

Mos
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hey guys.

I play a lot of airsoft, I also like physics, in airsoft LOADS of physics is in place there.

Basically, it's paintball, with realistic guns, shooting plastic BBs.

So, the question, if I shoot a 0.4g BB at 284 it will create I think 1.49 joules of energy.

When said BB is traveling in the air, if it was a 0.2g BB at the same joules of energy, which would go further?

I think it's the BB. At 0.4g as it keeps it's inertia and energy is not lost through particles of dust. Question two, is it the more energy something has, the further it will go?

Thanks guys,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could compare this to shooting an arrow. for the same pullback distance a lighter arrow will travel farther and faster than a heavier arrow. Because you pullback the bow to the same distance then the energy imparted will be the same. Some Airsoft guns use a spring mechanism that works in a similar fashion.

The 284 you mention must be 284 ft/sec and the 0.4g mass which you'd need to convert to MKS units if you want the answer in joules.

The equation ## KE = 1/2 m v^2## sums it up nicely but I'll leave it to you to go from here.

More on Airsoft guns:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airsoft_gun
 
In the overly ideal case of 2D kinematics (no drag and so forth) the maximum range of a BB is given by

r_{max} = \frac{v_0^2}{g}
where you aim it 45 degrees above the horizon.
The initial kinetic energy is
E_0 = \frac{1}{2}m v_0^2

Putting this together, you can get the max range in terms of the initial kinetic energy:
r_{max} =\frac{2 E_0}{m g}

Therefore, in this case, if you have the same initial kinetic energy, but a smaller mass, the max range of the BB will be farther because it will have had to travel faster initially to have that same kinetic energy. Drag or no drag, the initial velocity of the smaller BB will be faster at the same initial energy.

Including drag into the situation is a more complicated issue, as solving the range is done by computer (it turns out to be a transcendental equation, and cannot be solved by algebraic methods), but in the approximation that the BB is light and traveling slow enough initially, that at the end of its flight it's just falling straight down at terminal velocity, you can show that
r_{max}\approx \frac{v_0 m}{b}
where b is the drag coefficient of the armophere.

Combining this with the formula for the initial energy, we find:
r_{max}\approx \frac{1}{b}\sqrt{2 m E_0}

In this case, we see that if the initial energy is the same, but the mass is smaller, the range actually goes down due to drag.

What ends up happening in the field is somewhere between these two extremes.
If the final horizontal velocity is pretty much the same as your initial horizontal velocity, then drag isn't important, and you can use the first formula.
If your final horizontal velocity is near zero, then drag is dominant, and you should use the second formula.

If you're not accustomed to using a computer to solve equations, field testing in a large enough safe space would probably be easiest.
 
This wasn't homework or coursework.

But thank you.
So to sum up, if a mass of 0.4g leaves the barrel with an energy of 1.49 joules
Though a 0.2g mass leaves the barrel also with 1.49 joules

The latter will go further?
 
Mos said:
This wasn't homework or coursework.

But thank you.
So to sum up, if a mass of 0.4g leaves the barrel with an energy of 1.49 joules
Though a 0.2g mass leaves the barrel also with 1.49 joules

The latter will go further?

The latter will go further if it doesn't lose much horizontal velocity by the time it hits the ground again.
The former will go further if it does lose most of its horizontal velocity by that time.

f you're somewhere in between, you'll need to know what the terminal velocity of these BBs are (what their max falling speed is due to drag) to figure out which'll go further.

I can't imagine these BBs go very fast compared to the muzzle velocity if you just drop them from a large height, so my gut says drag will dominate, so that the former will go further.

To really be sure, you'll have to do your own tests. Experimental data trumps theoretical guesswork.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mos
Awesome, I will do some tests.

Thank you, my guess is the heavier BB will go further, due to airsofters research.
 
Mos said:
This wasn't homework or coursework.

But thank you.
So to sum up, if a mass of 0.4g leaves the barrel with an energy of 1.49 joules
Though a 0.2g mass leaves the barrel also with 1.49 joules

The latter will go further?

Okay I removed the warning.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K