B Alcyoneus Radio Galaxy: Myth or Reality? Discover the Truth Here!

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter MikeC111
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Galaxy Radio
AI Thread Summary
The Alcyoneus radio galaxy is confirmed to be real, as supported by a publication preprint available at arXiv. Its reported size of 5 Mpc refers to the extent of energetic particle emissions from the central black hole, not the physical size of the galaxy itself. The actual host galaxy is relatively small, with a mass lower than that of the Milky Way. The large size is attributed to the radio emissions that create lobes in the surrounding plasma, rather than a vast collection of stars. This clarification helps distinguish between the dimensions of the radio emissions and the galaxy's stellar mass.
MikeC111
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
How large is it?
I saw on another forum mention of Alcyoneus radio galaxy and have been google searching but can't find any information on it from any reputable astronomy related websites.

Is it real or just fake news?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
It's real. Here's the publication preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.05427

It's perhaps worth explaining what the 5 Mpc size means in this context, though.
It's not that this, and other like it, giant radio galaxies (GRGs) are this large in terms of a disc, or an ellipsoid, of stars extending to 5 Mpc end to end.
The quoted size is for the range of energetic particles emitted from the neighbourhood of the central black hole, which stream in long, thin jets at relativistic speeds, additionally exciting the extremely diffuse plasma surrounding the galaxy to form radio wave-emitting structures called 'lobes'.
The galaxy hosting this active galactic nucleus (AGN) is unremarkable. The mass is a few times lower than the Milky Way.

In this picture from Wikipedia, an example of a radio galaxy is shown:
1645014302747.png

The radio galaxy is the whole thing, so its size would be quoted as the distance between the terminal points of the radio emissions, shown in green. But the host galaxy, in the usual sense of a collection of stars, is barely larger than the central green point.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes berkeman and Ibix
Thank you for clearing that up for me. When someone said the galaxy was that big I thought it highly unlikely.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top