MHB Alexander's question via email about Newton's Method

Prove It
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,434
Reaction score
20
Alexander asks:

Apply three iterations of Newton's Method to find an approximate solution of the equation

$\displaystyle \mathrm{e}^{1.2\,x} = 1.5 + 2.5\cos^2{\left( x \right) } $

if your initial estimate is $\displaystyle x_0 = 1 $.

What solution do you get?
 

Attachments

  • nm1.jpg
    nm1.jpg
    30.8 KB · Views: 156
  • nm2.jpg
    nm2.jpg
    24.7 KB · Views: 165
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
@Prove It answers:

Newton's Method solves an equation of the form $\displaystyle f\left( x \right) = 0 $, so we need to rewrite the equation as

$\displaystyle \mathrm{e}^{1.2\,x} - 1.5 - 2.5\cos^2{\left( x \right) } = 0 $

Thus $\displaystyle f\left( x \right) = \mathrm{e}^{1.2\,x} - 1.5 - 2.5\cos^2{\left( x \right) }$.

Newton's Method is: $\displaystyle x_{n+1} = x_n - \frac{f\left( x_n \right) }{f'\left( x_n \right) } $

We will need the derivative, $\displaystyle f'\left( x \right) = 1.2\,\mathrm{e}^{1.2\,x} + 5\sin{\left( x \right) }\cos{\left( x \right) } $.I have used my CAS to do this problem:

View attachment 9644

View attachment 9645

So after three iterations the root is approximately $\displaystyle x_3 = 0.81797 $.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top