Algebra and analysis questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter JasonJo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Analysis
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on advanced topics in algebra and analysis, specifically integrability of functions and properties of homomorphisms. The participants explore the integrability of piecewise-defined functions on intervals, the implications of homomorphisms from fields to rings, and the isomorphism between the quotient ring Q[x]/ and Q[sqrt(2)]. Key concepts include the epsilon-delta definition of integrability, Riemann sums, and the conditions for a homomorphism to be an isomorphism. Participants emphasize the importance of clear definitions and proofs in their arguments.

PREREQUISITES
  • Epsilon-delta definition of integrability
  • Riemann sums and the Riemann criterion for integrability
  • Properties of homomorphisms and isomorphisms in algebra
  • Understanding of quotient rings and field extensions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Riemann criterion for integrability in detail
  • Learn about Upper and Lower Riemann sums and their applications
  • Explore the properties of homomorphisms between fields and rings
  • Investigate the construction of isomorphisms in algebraic structures
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying algebra and analysis, as well as educators looking for insights into teaching integrability and homomorphism concepts.

JasonJo
Messages
425
Reaction score
2
(1) let f: [a,b] --> R be an integrable function. Consider a sequence (Pn) of tagged partitions with ||Pn|| -> 0. Prove that int over [a,b] of f(x) = lim n-> infinity of S(f, (Pn)).
- i stated what it means for a function to be integrable, using the episolon-delta definition, but i can't seem to find the step i need.

(2)
(a) Let f: [0,1] -> R be defined by:
f(x) = 1 if x=1/n for n a natural number
= 0 otherwise

is f integrable? if so find int of f(x) over [0,1]
(b) same question for g: [0,1] -> R
g(x)=n if x=1/n for some n a natural number
= 0 otherwise

(3) prove that a homomorphism from a field to a ring with more than one element must be an isomorphism.
- i got that kerT, where T is our homomorphism, is trivial. i just don't get the onto proof yet. why is T onto? i tried assuming it's not onto and trying to derive a contradiction that kerT is not trivial.

check it out:
suppose T is not onto, then there exists an element r in the ring R such that there does not exist f in the field such that T(f) = r. however, there exists r1 + r2 = r and f1 and f2 such that T(f1)=r1 and T(f2)=r2, then T(f1+f2)=r1+r2=r, which is a contradiction. but this doesn't seem to be right

(4) prove that Q[x]/<x^2-2> is ring isomorphic to Q[sqrt(2)].
- i can't find a proper isomorphism. really stuck

thanks guys! last homeworks of the semester!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
1,2. I'm getting sick of saying this, but PLEASE INCLUDE THE DEFINITIONS YOU'RE USING. In this case, how are you defining the integral of a function, and what are the integrable functions?

3. This isn't true. You always have the trivial homomorphism, sending every element to 0. If you exclude this, you can pretty easily prove the homomorphism is injective, and so is an isomorphism between the field and its image. But there's no way to guarantee it's surjective. For example, say there's a isomorphsim from F->R, and R is a proper subring of S, then there is a non-surjective homomorphsim from F to S. (for a more explicit example, take the inclusion homomorphism from the field Q to the ring R.) Also note your proof doesn't use any properties specific to this case, so essentially you've proven every homomorphism whatsoever is surjective. (by the way, you haven't)

4. Show more work. Write out definitions.
 
Last edited:
Question (2) is very simple: do you know the Riemann criterion for integrability? Do you know about Upper and Lower Riemann sums?
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K