Algebra Algebra equivalent to Euclid’s Elements?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers around finding historical algebra literature comparable to Euclid's "Elements." Al Kwarizmi is highlighted as a key figure, with his work being one of the earliest texts on algebra, although it is described more as a practical manual than a theoretical treatise like Euclid's. Suggestions include Leonard Euler's "Elements of Algebra" and Diophantus' "Arithmetica," both of which offer significant insights into algebra. The conversation notes that while Arab scholars did systematize algebra, earlier works lacked the rigorous logical structure that Euclid provided for geometry. It is suggested that modern algebra texts may serve better for those seeking a structured approach akin to Euclid's, as earlier texts are more foundational and less abstract. The discussion emphasizes the evolution of algebraic thought, mentioning figures like Francois Viete and Descartes, who contributed to the development of algebraic symbolism and analytic geometry.
mathwhizpro
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
I want to get a copy of historical Algebra literature that essentially the equivalent of Euclid’s Elements for Algebra. Does anyone have any recommendations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
mathwhizpro said:
I want to get a copy of historical Algebra literature that essentially the equivalent of Euclid’s Elements for Algebra.

What do you mean by "equivalent"? Are you looking for a textbook of algebra that follows the same step-by-step intuitive style of presenting algebra as Euclid used in his Elements to present geometry and number theory? I don't think such a textbook exists for abstract alglebra. Algebra is a different ball game than plane geometry.
 
Thank you for the suggestions!
 
I like the Euler suggestion. One issue with the search for a book analogous with Euclid is that, though Euclid imposed the logical structure, many of the results were well-known from earlier mathematicians.

Though Arab scholars did systematize algebra a bit, Al Kwarizmi's book (according to Katz – I have not seen the text) is more of a practical manual rather than a theoretical treatise as the Elements is. Further, I believe all of the justification for the algebraic relations were still proven using geometry.

You could look at works of Francois Viete who made steps toward more abstract symbolism. Descartes also moved things forward with the introduction of analytic geometry. Beyond this and we're probably up to Euler. But, in a sense, if you want something that is analogous to Euclid for algebra it is probably best to find a modern algebra text because all of these earlier works are akin to geometrical works that came before Euclid (attempted) to rigorously systematize it. It's just that none of them (to my knowledge) survived, probably, at least in part, due to the success of the Elements. Reading Al Kwarizimi or Viete would be like reading Thales or Theaetetus instead of Euclid.
 
i am self learning physics. have you ever worked your way backwards again after finishing most undergrad courses? i have textbooks for junior/senior physics courses in classical mechanics, electrodynamics, thermal physics, quantum mechanics, and mathematical methods for self learning. i have the Halliday Resnick sophomore book. working backwards, i checked out Conceptual Physics 11th edition by Hewitt and found this book very helpful. What i liked most was how stimulating the pictures...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
9K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K