Algebra, ring question with even integers

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the set of even integers, denoted as E, and a newly defined multiplication operation * on E, where a*b = ab/2. Participants seek clarification on demonstrating the associative property of multiplication and the distributive law within this context. The correct interpretation of the associative property is confirmed as (a*b)*c = abc/4, while the distributive law is clarified as a*(b+c) = a*b + a*c, not a*(b+c) = ab*ac.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of binary operations in algebra
  • Familiarity with the properties of associative and distributive laws
  • Knowledge of even integers and their mathematical properties
  • Basic multiplication and addition operations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of binary operations in algebra
  • Learn more about the associative property in various mathematical contexts
  • Explore the distributive law with examples in algebra
  • Investigate the implications of defining new operations on sets
USEFUL FOR

Students of algebra, mathematics educators, and anyone interested in exploring the properties of operations on sets of integers.

jasonfarley89
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
We have E the set of even integers with ordinary addition Define new multiplication * on E defined as

a*b = ab/2 where on the right hand side of the equation is just normal multiplication.

I am just a bit confused i am trying to show Associative multiplication meaning i have to show

(a*b)*c = a*(b*c)

when i do (a*b)*c am i supposed to get (ab/2)(c/2) ?? i feel like i am just doing something really stupid here

Can someone explain? Its binary operation so it can only take two elements at a time right?

also i am bit confused with distributive law,

so a*(b+c) = a(b+c)/2? i want to be equal to (ab)*(ac) = ab(ac)/2 right?

Can someone help please
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
should it be that (a*b)*c = (ab/2) *c = ab/2(c/2) so i have ab(c/2)/2 = (abc/2)/2 = abc/4? that correct?
 
Yes, that's correct, although I might parenthesize it a little differently: [tex](a * b) * c = (ab/2) * c = ((ab/2)c)/2 = abc/4[/tex].

For the distributive law, you want [tex]a * (b + c) = a * b + a * c[/tex], not [tex]a * (b + c) = ab * ac[/tex].
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K