Algebraic and normal field extensions.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Artusartos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Normal
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
Artusartos
Messages
236
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let [itex]K[/itex] be an algebraic field extension of a field [itex]F[/itex], and let [itex]L[/itex] be a subfield of [itex]K[/itex] such that [itex]F \subseteq L[/itex] and [itex]L[/itex] is normal in F. Show that if [itex]\sigma[/itex] is an automorphism of [itex]K[/itex] over [itex]F[/itex], then [itex]\sigma(L)=L[/itex].

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I've been thinking about this for a while, but I couldn't really prove anything. So I'm just looking for a hint that will help me get started...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
micromass said:
What is your definition of a normal extension?

If [itex]f \in F[x][/itex] has one root in [itex]L[/itex], then it splits over [itex]L[/itex].
 
micromass said:
Take an element ##a\in L##. Use that ##K## is algebraic to find a polynomial ##f\in F[x]## such that ##f(a)=0##. What can you tell about ##f(\sigma(a))##?

I'm guessing that I can assume that ##\sigma## fixes ##F## since it says "##\sigma## is an automorphism of ##K## over ##F##". If that's true, then

##f(a)=b_0 + b_1a + b_2a^2 + ... + b_na^n = 0##

So,

##f(\sigma(a))= b_0 + b_1\sigma(a) + ... + b_n\sigma(a) = \sigma(b_0+b_1a+...+b_na^n)= \sigma(0)=0.##

So ##\sigma(a)## must be a root of ##f##. But since #L# is normal, it must contain all the other roots of ##f##. So, basically, ##\sigma## just permutes the roots of a given polynomial over ##F## with roots in ##L##, meaning that ##\sigma(L)=L##. Is that correct?
 
Artusartos said:
I'm guessing that I can assume that ##\sigma## fixes ##F## since it says "##\sigma## is an automorphism of ##K## over ##F##". If that's true, then

#f(a)=b_0 + b_1a + b_2a^2 + ... + b_na^n = 0#

So,

#f(\sigma(a))= b_0 + b_1\sigma(a) + ... + b_n\sigma(a) = \sigma(b_0+b_1a+...+b_na^n)= \sigma(0)=0.#

So #\sigma(a)# must be a root of #f#. But since #L# is normal, it must contain all the other roots of #f#. So, basically, #\sigma# just permutes the roots of a given polynomial over #F# with roots in #L#, meaning that #\sigma(L)=L#. Is that correct?

Yes, that's what I had in mind.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person