MHB Algebraic expression simplification 2(2u+v)/u = 4(v^2-4u^2)/3u^2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nightspider
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expression
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on simplifying the algebraic expression 2(2u+v)/u = 4(v^2-4u^2)/3u^2, which is expected to simplify to 3u = 2(v-2u). The user struggles with the simplification process despite trying various methods, including rearranging and factorization. A solution is provided, demonstrating that multiplying both sides by 3u^2 and applying the difference of squares leads to the desired expression. The final result, 3u = 2(v - 2u), is confirmed to be valid under the condition that v + 2u is not equal to zero. This exchange highlights the importance of understanding algebraic manipulation in relation to physics assignments.
Nightspider
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi All

I am trying to simplify an algebraic expression, I know what the expression should simplify to but I am struggling to simplify it.

The expression is: 2(2u+v)/u = 4(v^2-4u^2)/3u^2

and it is supposed to simplify to: 3u = 2(v-2u)

I have approached this problem from various angles by rearranging the expression and factorization but I can't seem to simplify it. Any pointers would be greatly appreciated. This is my first time posting on a forum so if I have not followed any of the rules of the forum please advise me. In the interest of transparency this is part of an assignment question from a module in a part time Physics degree I am doing as a mature student. For the purposes of this assignment I believe the important thing is to understand the Physics hence the fact that I am asking for some help with the math's. That being said I spent a significant amount of time trying to understand the math's before posting here.

Many Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Nightspider said:
Hi All

I am trying to simplify an algebraic expression, I know what the expression should simplify to but I am struggling to simplify it.

The expression is: 2(2u+v)/u = 4(v^2-4u^2)/3u^2

and it is supposed to simplify to: 3u = 2(v-2u)

I have approached this problem from various angles by rearranging the expression and factorization but I can't seem to simplify it. Any pointers would be greatly appreciated. This is my first time posting on a forum so if I have not followed any of the rules of the forum please advise me. In the interest of transparency this is part of an assignment question from a module in a part time Physics degree I am doing as a mature student. For the purposes of this assignment I believe the important thing is to understand the Physics hence the fact that I am asking for some help with the math's. That being said I spent a significant amount of time trying to understand the math's before posting here.

Many Thanks

So we have, $ \dfrac{2(v + 2u)}{u} = \dfrac{4(v^2-4u^2)}{3u^2}$. If we multiply both sides by $3u^2$ we obtain,

$ 6u(v + 2u)= 4(v^2-4u^2)$.

Now the right hand side can be expressed as: $4(v^2 - (2u)^2) = 4(v - 2u)(v + 2u)$. This is called the difference of two squares, and when first starting out, it isn't necessarily an obvious step.

Continuing,

$ 6u(v + 2u)= 4(v - 2u)(v + 2u)$,

now if we divide by $2(v + 2u)$ we arrive at,

$ 3u = \dfrac{\cancelto{2}{4}(v - 2u) \cancel{(v + 2u)}}{\cancel{2} \cancel{(v + 2u)}}$ which is desired expression,

$3u = 2(v - 2u)$.
 
Notice that this equivalence is true only if [math]v+ 2u\ne 0[/math].
 
Brilliant many thanks. Seems easy once someone who knows how shows you but I spent quite some time looking at it. Your swift reply is very much appreciated.

Thank You
 
$7u=2v$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top