MHB Algebraic expression simplification 2(2u+v)/u = 4(v^2-4u^2)/3u^2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nightspider
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expression
Nightspider
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi All

I am trying to simplify an algebraic expression, I know what the expression should simplify to but I am struggling to simplify it.

The expression is: 2(2u+v)/u = 4(v^2-4u^2)/3u^2

and it is supposed to simplify to: 3u = 2(v-2u)

I have approached this problem from various angles by rearranging the expression and factorization but I can't seem to simplify it. Any pointers would be greatly appreciated. This is my first time posting on a forum so if I have not followed any of the rules of the forum please advise me. In the interest of transparency this is part of an assignment question from a module in a part time Physics degree I am doing as a mature student. For the purposes of this assignment I believe the important thing is to understand the Physics hence the fact that I am asking for some help with the math's. That being said I spent a significant amount of time trying to understand the math's before posting here.

Many Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Nightspider said:
Hi All

I am trying to simplify an algebraic expression, I know what the expression should simplify to but I am struggling to simplify it.

The expression is: 2(2u+v)/u = 4(v^2-4u^2)/3u^2

and it is supposed to simplify to: 3u = 2(v-2u)

I have approached this problem from various angles by rearranging the expression and factorization but I can't seem to simplify it. Any pointers would be greatly appreciated. This is my first time posting on a forum so if I have not followed any of the rules of the forum please advise me. In the interest of transparency this is part of an assignment question from a module in a part time Physics degree I am doing as a mature student. For the purposes of this assignment I believe the important thing is to understand the Physics hence the fact that I am asking for some help with the math's. That being said I spent a significant amount of time trying to understand the math's before posting here.

Many Thanks

So we have, $ \dfrac{2(v + 2u)}{u} = \dfrac{4(v^2-4u^2)}{3u^2}$. If we multiply both sides by $3u^2$ we obtain,

$ 6u(v + 2u)= 4(v^2-4u^2)$.

Now the right hand side can be expressed as: $4(v^2 - (2u)^2) = 4(v - 2u)(v + 2u)$. This is called the difference of two squares, and when first starting out, it isn't necessarily an obvious step.

Continuing,

$ 6u(v + 2u)= 4(v - 2u)(v + 2u)$,

now if we divide by $2(v + 2u)$ we arrive at,

$ 3u = \dfrac{\cancelto{2}{4}(v - 2u) \cancel{(v + 2u)}}{\cancel{2} \cancel{(v + 2u)}}$ which is desired expression,

$3u = 2(v - 2u)$.
 
Notice that this equivalence is true only if [math]v+ 2u\ne 0[/math].
 
Brilliant many thanks. Seems easy once someone who knows how shows you but I spent quite some time looking at it. Your swift reply is very much appreciated.

Thank You
 
$7u=2v$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top