Tedious Simplification: Show expression is real

  • Thread starter Thread starter JolleJ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expression
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on simplifying a complex mathematical expression that contains both real and imaginary components, specifically using Maple and Mathematica. The user seeks techniques to demonstrate that the expression is purely real despite the presence of imaginary units. Suggestions include manipulating the imaginary units and leveraging the capabilities of Maple and Mathematica for simplification. The expression involves intricate algebraic terms and requires advanced algebraic manipulation skills for effective simplification.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with complex numbers and their properties
  • Proficiency in using Maple 2023 for symbolic computation
  • Experience with Mathematica 13 for mathematical simplification
  • Understanding of algebraic manipulation techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advanced simplification techniques in Maple 2023
  • Explore the use of Mathematica's Simplify and FullSimplify functions
  • Learn about the properties of complex conjugates in algebra
  • Investigate methods for proving identities involving complex expressions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students in advanced algebra courses, and anyone working with symbolic computation in Maple or Mathematica who needs to simplify complex expressions.

JolleJ
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
After doing A LOT of simplification on a complicated expression I am now at a point where my own skills can't take me any further.

My problem is that I have an expression, which I am almost certain must be real, but it contains the imaginary units here and there. I have tried using Maple and Mathematica with different assumptions, but it does not simplify very much.

Now, I do not expect you to do my tedious algebra. However, I was hoping that one of you might know of a technique (in Maple/Mathematica/Hand) that could help me?

My expression is this:

{\frac {\sqrt [3]{2}n \left( -1+n \right) \left( -1+2\,n \right) <br /> \left( 2\,\sqrt [3]{-2}+4\,\sqrt [3]{-2} \left( -1+n \right) n+<br /> \left( -1-2\,n \left( 1+ \left( -3+n \right) n \right) +i\sqrt {1-16<br /> \,n+44\,{n}^{2}-44\,{n}^{3}+28\,{n}^{4}-24\,{n}^{5}+12\,{n}^{6}}<br /> \right) ^{2/3}-i\sqrt {3} \left( -1-2\,n \left( 1+ \left( -3+n<br /> \right) n \right) +i\sqrt {1-16\,n+44\,{n}^{2}-44\,{n}^{3}+28\,{n}^{4<br /> }-24\,{n}^{5}+12\,{n}^{6}} \right) ^{2/3} \right) }{\sqrt [3]{-1-2\,n<br /> \left( 1+ \left( -3+n \right) n \right) +i\sqrt {1-16\,n+44\,{n}^{2}-<br /> 44\,{n}^{3}+28\,{n}^{4}-24\,{n}^{5}+12\,{n}^{6}}} \left( -8+16\,n<br /> \right) }}
where n is an interger larger than 1.

as you can see the same terms appear many places.Any help will be greatly appreciated.

Maple format:
Code:
2^(1/3)*n*(-1+n)*(-1+2*n)*(2*(-2)^(1/3)+4*(-2)^(1/3)*(-1+n)*n+(-1-2*n*(1+(-3+n)*n)+I*sqrt(1-16*n+44*n^2-44*n^3+28*n^4-24*n^5+12*n^6))^(2/3)-I*sqrt(3)*(-1-2*n*(1+(-3+n)*n)+I*sqrt(1-16*n+44*n^2-44*n^3+28*n^4-24*n^5+12*n^6))^(2/3))/((-1-2*n*(1+(-3+n)*n)+I*sqrt(1-16*n+44*n^2-44*n^3+28*n^4-24*n^5+12*n^6))^(1/3)*(-8+16*n))

Mathematica format:
Code:
(2^(1/3) (-1 + n) n (-1 + 2 n) (2 (-2)^(1/3) + 
     4 (-2)^(1/3) (-1 + n) n + (-1 - 2 n (1 + (-3 + n) n) + 
       I Sqrt[1 - 16 n + 44 n^2 - 44 n^3 + 28 n^4 - 24 n^5 + 
         12 n^6])^(2/3) - 
     I Sqrt[3] (-1 - 2 n (1 + (-3 + n) n) + 
        I Sqrt[1 - 16 n + 44 n^2 - 44 n^3 + 28 n^4 - 24 n^5 + 
          12 n^6])^(2/3)))/((-8 + 16 n) (-1 - 2 n (1 + (-3 + n) n) + 
     I Sqrt[1 - 16 n + 44 n^2 - 44 n^3 + 28 n^4 - 24 n^5 + 12 n^6])^(
   1/3))

Thanks in advance
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's one idea:

If the number is pure real, then you can multiply the i's by -1 and after this, you should have the same number as before.
 
Thanks. Yes, that is a good idea. However, the expression is so complicated that it doesn't really help. I can't show the expressions are the same.

And actually, which I should have clarified, I do need the simplified expression.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K