Algebriac Structures,hom wrecker

  • Thread starter Thread starter happyg1
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around defining a homomorphism \( T^*: Hom(W,F) \rightarrow Hom(V,F) \) based on a given homomorphism \( T: V \rightarrow W \). The context involves algebraic structures, specifically vector spaces over a field.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to define \( T^* \) and show it is a homomorphism, while also expressing uncertainty about the correctness of their approach. Participants question the definitions of the algebraic structures involved and discuss the implications of the definitions on the proof.

Discussion Status

Participants have provided feedback on the original poster's attempts, with some affirming the definitions and others suggesting that certain aspects of the proof are trivial. There is an ongoing exploration of the requirements set by the professor and the clarity of the definitions involved.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the need to express ideas in the original poster's own language to avoid issues with academic integrity. The discussion also touches on the nature of the algebraic structures and the specifics of working with right modules for rings.

happyg1
Messages
304
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let [tex]T:V \rightarrow W[/tex] be a homomorphism. Using T, define a homomorphism [tex]T^*<img src="/styles/physicsforums/xenforo/smilies/arghh.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":H" title="Gah! :H" data-shortname=":H" />om(W,F) \rightarrow Hom(V,F)[/tex].




Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



This is what I have so far:
let [tex]f \in Hom(W,F)[/tex]
Define [tex]f(T^*):V \rightarrow F[/tex]
and [tex](v)((f)T^*)=((v)T)f[/tex]

Ok so then I need to show that [tex]T^*[/tex] is acutually a homomorphism.
So I tried this:
Let [tex]\lambda \in T^*[/tex]
Then
[tex]\lambda(f+g)T^*=\lambda(f(T^*)+g(T^*))[/tex]
[tex]=\lambda((f(T^*)) + \lambda(g(T^*))[/tex]
[tex]=(\lambda f)(T^*) + (\lambda g)(T^*)[/tex]
[tex]=(\lambda f +\lambda g) T^*[/tex]
[tex]=(\lambda f)T^* = (\lambda g)T^*[/tex]

So [tex]T^*[/tex] is a homomorphism.

I'm not sure if this is the correct approach since I have a slippery grasp on this stuff. My Prof says I need to also show that [tex]f(T^*) \in Hom(V,F)[/tex] that doesn't seem intuituvely difficult, but my problem is WRITING IT DOWN.

Any input will be greatly appreciated.

CC
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Precisely WHAT algebraic structures are V and W and what is F? My guess is that V and W are vector spaces over field F but I don't know for sure.
 
Your are correct, V and W are vector spaces over a field F.
Sorry.
 
Poor lad, having to write things on the wrong side like that.

I would say to your professor that it is bloody trivial bby definition that fT* is in Hom(V,F): it is a linear map from V to F.
 
yeah, I don't know why we are putting things on the right like that, but we do.
I agree that [tex]f(T^*) \in Hom(V,F)[/tex] is trivial, but apparently he wants it.
Am I correct in my attempt at the other part?

Thanks

CC
 
You're putting things on the right because you're looking at right modules for rings. There is a good reason for this, but not an interesting one for you.

fT* is in Hom(V,F) *by definition*. I.e. you defined it as a function from V to F, and the rest of you proof shows it is a linear map i.e. an element of Hom(V,F). Thus *my* response to you professor is "we define a function from V to F as follows: if v is in V then vfT*=(vT)f (IF YOU WANT MORE DETAILS, THEN vT IS IN V SINCE V IS A FUNCTION FROM V TO V, AND f IS A FUNCTION FROM V TO F. Now we show that this is actually a linear map. INSERT YOUR PROOF"

the caps aren't 'shouty'. You should think about replacing them with something more appropriate. Oh, and don't copy the rest of this into your work either. A professor can tell precisely what you write from a mathematician's writing. Put it in your language.
 
Hey,
Thanks for the response.
Just so you guys know, My Prof knows me well enough to spot ANYTHING that's not precisely in my own language, so no worries.

Am I correct in my attempt that [tex]T^*[/tex] is a Hom above? I think since no one has said I'm completely wrong that I must be on the right track.

Thanks again,
CC
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K