Aligning a Michelson interferometer

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on aligning the two arms of a Michelson interferometer using a continuous wave (CW) HeNe laser. The user seeks methods to achieve equal path lengths within 30 microns, given the coherence length of the laser is significantly longer. Suggestions include using filtered broadband light to reduce coherence length and employing LEDs with shorter coherence lengths as alternatives. The user currently utilizes a coarse translation stage with a travel range of 50 mm and a step size of 1 micron for mirror adjustments.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Michelson interferometer principles
  • Familiarity with coherence length and its implications in optical experiments
  • Experience with laser alignment techniques, specifically using CW HeNe lasers
  • Knowledge of optical components such as filters and LEDs
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for using filtered broadband light in interferometry
  • Learn about the coherence lengths of various light sources, including LEDs
  • Explore techniques for precise mirror adjustments in optical setups
  • Investigate the use of piezo-driven delay lines for fine-tuning optical paths
USEFUL FOR

Optical physicists, experimentalists working with interferometry, and anyone involved in precision optical measurements will benefit from this discussion.

johng23
Messages
292
Reaction score
1
Are there any tricks for getting the two arms of a Michelson interferometer exactly equal, if all I have is a CW HeNe laser to align? The real experiment will be using the interferometer on short pulses, so I will only see interference when the path lengths are equal to within 30 microns or so. I can't think of any way, since the coherence length is probably 10's of centimeters.

I saw some website that was saying that as you scan the delay of one arm, the fringes will move in one direction, and when you pass the equal length point, they will move in the opposite direction. But that makes no sense to me. Maybe I'm just not seeing it, but if I visualize scanning two beams past each other, the fringes continually move in one direction, and the absolute difference in phase is not discernable.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Just a question to understand your problem better: You have already aligned the two beams such that they are perfectly parallel and are now looking for the exact position of zero relative delay, right?

If so, how exactly are you moving your movable mirror? Coarse movable delay line, piezo-driven fine delay or both? And what exactly is the highest possible distance you can move it?
 
Cthugha said:
Just a question to understand your problem better: You have already aligned the two beams such that they are perfectly parallel and are now looking for the exact position of zero relative delay, right?

If so, how exactly are you moving your movable mirror? Coarse movable delay line, piezo-driven fine delay or both? And what exactly is the highest possible distance you can move it?

The two beams probably are as close to parallel as I can make them. My movable mirror is on a coarse translation stage, with a total travel of 50 mm. The smallest step size is 1 um, and I'm not even sure how repeatable that is.
 
johng23 said:
Are there any tricks for getting the two arms of a Michelson interferometer exactly equal, if all I have is a CW HeNe laser to align? The real experiment will be using the interferometer on short pulses, so I will only see interference when the path lengths are equal to within 30 microns or so. I can't think of any way, since the coherence length is probably 10's of centimeters.

Tricky problem- the best I could think of, if you have the equipment, is to use filtered broadband light. For example, I have some filters that pass about 20nm wide spectra centered on green, blue, red, etc. The coherence length approaches 30 microns in some cases (500 nm +/- 10 nm passband)
 
A step size of 1 micron might make measurements complicated. Unless of course you are not interested in visible light, but far infrared or the terahertz range. In that case it would not pose a problem.

Regarding the problem itself, Andy Resnick is right. Filtering broadband white light or something similar is a good idea. As an alternative, there are some common LEDs with coherence lengths in the micron range. Those should also not be that expensive.
 
Ok thanks everyone. I ran out of time, I guess I'll just try to measure it with a tape measure and look for my signal the hard way. :rolleyes:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
521
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K