Allowed and Forbidden Electron-Photon Reactions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vrbic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reactions
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 1K views
Vrbic
Messages
400
Reaction score
18

Homework Statement


Show, using spacetime diagrams and also using frame-independent calculations, that the law of conservation of 4-momentum forbids a photon to be absorbed by an electron, e + γ → e.

Homework Equations


##\textbf{p}_{e1}+\textbf{p}_{\gamma}=\textbf{p}_{e2}## : ##(E_1,\vec{p_1})+(E_{\gamma},E_{\gamma}\vec{n})=(E,\vec{p_2})##,
where ##\textbf{p}## is 4-vector, ##\vec{p}## is ordinary 3-vector and ##\vec{n}## is unit vector in photon's direction.
##E=\sqrt{p^2+m^2}##

The Attempt at a Solution


I take only 3-vecotrs and I (I hope I may) suppose ##\vec{p_1}=0## i.e. is in rest.
##\vec{0}+E_{\gamma}\vec{n}=p_2\vec{n}=>\sqrt{E^2-m^2}=E_{\gamma}##
First time I put there ##E=\frac{1}{2}mv^2## but I feel it is not good probably. Is my beginning right? What should I use or think about?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You used conservation of momentum so far.
What about conservation of energy?

The problem is easier in the reference frame of the electron in the final state.
 
mfb said:
You used conservation of momentum so far.
What about conservation of energy?

The problem is easier in the reference frame of the electron in the final state.
Ok, ##(\gamma m, \vec{p}) + (E_{\gamma},E_{\gamma}\vec{n})=(m,\vec{0})##. Right? From energy part than we have ##E_{\gamma}=m(1-\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-v^2}})<0##. And it is this problem, negative photon's energy?
 
Right.

Time-reversed, the process would be an electron at rest emitting a photon and gaining kinetic energy at the same time. Written like that, it should be clear that it cannot happen.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vrbic
mfb said:
Right.

Time-reversed, the process would be an electron at rest emitting a photon and gaining kinetic energy at the same time. Written like that, it should be clear that it cannot happen.
Thank you.