ALMA vs James Webb: Which telescope will reveal more about the universe?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the capabilities of the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) and the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). ALMA consists of 66 radio telescopes designed to observe millimeter and submillimeter wavelengths, while JWST is an infrared telescope optimized for observing the universe in infrared light. Each telescope serves distinct roles in astronomy, with JWST offering advantages such as operating in space to avoid atmospheric distortions and the ability to observe distant galaxies up to redshift z=20, surpassing Hubble's limit of z=9.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic spectrum and its various wavelengths
  • Familiarity with the capabilities of ALMA and JWST telescopes
  • Knowledge of astronomical redshift and its significance in observing distant galaxies
  • Awareness of the impact of atmospheric conditions on astronomical observations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the specific capabilities and scientific goals of the James Webb Space Telescope
  • Explore the operational principles of the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array
  • Learn about the significance of redshift in cosmology and its measurement techniques
  • Investigate the advancements in infrared capabilities of modern optical telescopes
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students interested in the comparative analysis of space telescopes and their contributions to our understanding of the universe.

revo74
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
What are the differences between these telescopes and which telescope will do more for our understanding of the universe? I know that ALMA is a series (66) radio telescopes, however, it also operates with optical telescopes. James Webb is an infrared telescope.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
each is designed to look at different parts of the EM spectrum
as such there is no competetion between them, they each have their own "jobs"

Observing the universe over a broad range of frequencies from low freq RF through IR, visible light and to X-rays and Gamma, gives a better overall picture of what is going on out there


Dave
 
davenn said:
each is designed to look at different parts of the EM spectrum
as such there is no competetion between them, they each have their own "jobs"

Observing the universe over a broad range of frequencies from low freq RF through IR, visible light and to X-rays and Gamma, gives a better overall picture of what is going on out there


Dave

Thanks for the response. Are you aware of any other capabilities James Webb will be able to do that ALMA won't be able to? I read about James Webb and mentioned it to my brother. He said for 8 billion dollars it's a waste of money in light the fact that the Hubble and other optical telescopes are now outfitted with infrared capabilities and that there are other new generation telescopes coming online soon.
 
We could simply judge which one is going to be the best by its fame. The JWST is definitely a great expectation for astronomers and cosmologists. But if we are going to judge by the facts, then we'll have a harder time to compare them because they aren't so alike. A great plus of the JWST is that it will be in space, without the distortions the atmosphere can cause. I can't wait to see what this telescope is going to discover.

cb
 
See http://jwst.nasa.gov/comparison.html for discussion of Hubble capabilities. Among other things, it will permit views of the universe out to around z=20. The Hubble can only reach out to z=9 on the best of days.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
6K