Doubt about the relativity of simultaneity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relativity of simultaneity as it pertains to measurements of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature. Two observers, A and B, measure the CMB temperature using radio telescopes, with A perceiving simultaneous measurements while B perceives a time difference due to relative motion. The key conclusion is that simultaneity is frame-dependent; observer B's interpretation of the measurements leads to confusion about the universe's expansion and isotropy. The conversation highlights the philosophical implications of simultaneity in the context of special relativity and the CMB.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation
  • Familiarity with special relativity and simultaneity
  • Knowledge of Doppler effect in astrophysics
  • Basic concepts of reference frames in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of the Doppler effect on CMB measurements
  • Study the principles of special relativity and its impact on simultaneity
  • Investigate the concept of isotropy in cosmology
  • Examine philosophical interpretations of simultaneity in physics
USEFUL FOR

Astrophysicists, cosmologists, and students of physics interested in the implications of relativity and the nature of time and simultaneity in the universe.

  • #31
Ideassimples said:
Since from the reference frame of observer B, radio telescope 1 is turned on first and then radio telescope 2, observer B expects that the measurement of the mean temperature of the cosmic microwave background of radio telescope 1 is higher than that of radio telescope 2. Without However this does not happen, both measures are identical.

So according to B the other beam travels for a very very very very long time, and then the beam is in a universe that is not very very old.

Is this perhaps a correct rephrasing of the problem?(Let's say B travels extremely fast relative to the telescopes, and also let's say the telescopes are not so far apart that expansion of universe matters.)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
jartsa said:
the other beam

What "other beam" are you talking about?

The OP's scenario doesn't include any "beams". The radio telescopes are measuring the CMB at their location; they're not sending or receiving "beams".
 
  • #33
PeterDonis said:
What "other beam" are you talking about?

The OP's scenario doesn't include any "beams". The radio telescopes are measuring the CMB at their location; they're not sending or receiving "beams".
OP said: "Right in the center is a light source, with no relative motion relative to radio telescopes. The light source sends a beam of light to each radio telescope, hits the switch, turns them on."
 
  • #34
jartsa said:
OP said: "Right in the center is a light source, with no relative motion relative to radio telescopes. The light source sends a beam of light to each radio telescope, hits the switch, turns them on."

Ah, ok. But these "beams" have nothing to do with the actual measurements the radio telescopes are making. They're just a way of specifying in what frame the measurements made by the radio telescopes are simultaneous (the A frame, in which both telescopes are at rest).

Everyone appears to agree that in the B frame, the measurements are not simultaneous; explaining how that comes about is not the issue. The issue is how an observer at rest in the B frame explains the fact that both measurements still give the same result for the CMB temperature, which means that the "age of the universe" under the usual definition of that term (which is not the same as "coordinate time elapsed in the B frame") is the same at both measurements, even though they are not simultaneous in the B frame.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 221 ·
8
Replies
221
Views
15K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 116 ·
4
Replies
116
Views
9K