Almost 9000 authors on this paper

  • Thread starter Thread starter BWV
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Authors Paper
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a paper with 8,778 authors, raising curiosity about how such coordination was achieved. It humorously notes that the paper contains approximately 10,000 words, leading to a calculation of about one word per author, not including the extensive author list. The conversation touches on the implications of authorship in large collaborations, particularly in physics, where contributions from many individuals, especially those involved with the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), are recognized. Participants question the validity of including authors who may not have significantly contributed and suggest the need for clearer distinctions between contributors and authors. The tone is light-hearted, with remarks about the paper resembling a "phone directory" and a mention of a non-peer-reviewed status, highlighting the complexities of authorship in collaborative scientific work.
BWV
Messages
1,571
Reaction score
1,925
  • Wow
Likes Rive, Borg and berkeman
Physics news on Phys.org
Flash mob at a Physics convention?
 
  • Haha
Likes DennisN and PeroK
Fun fact: There are about 10 000 words in the paper, so around 1 word per author. That is not counting the list of authors at the end: It is just as long as the paper itself so then we have 2 words per author!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes pinball1970, BWV and berkeman
I assume the problem is it uses the lhc, which means anyone who contributed to running it becomes an author.
 
A. Where did you get that number? It should eb 3000-4000.
B. Which author or authors do you think did not contribute?
 
mathematicians have something to learn
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Which author or authors do you think did not contribute?
Francesco Costanza. If he's anything like his brother George he's just coasting on the work of others.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes russ_watters, DennisN and Vanadium 50
Office_Shredder said:
Francesco Costanza. If he's anything like his brother George he's just coasting on the work of others.
Brian Cox is missing
 
Which surname - Aad or Zwalinski - would be better for a physics career?
 
  • #10
Office_Shredder said:
anyone who contributed to running it becomes an author.
Maybe time to have a list of contributors and a list of authors o_O
Thousands of authors... Nice piece of phone directory, I guess :book:

Ps.: well, that's actually not exactly a joke... Sometimes what you need is just a list of names possibly working in a specific field of study. But thousands of names - ugh :doh:
 
  • #11
Unfortunately the paper is not peer-reviewed - they were all listed as co-authors except that one guy nobody likes who got left out and he is too pissed to read the paper
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes jbriggs444, Borg, BillTre and 1 other person

Similar threads

Back
Top