Alternative form of geodesic equation for calculating Christoffels

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the geodesic equation as presented in Thomas Moore's "A General Relativity Workbook." The original geodesic equation is expressed in two forms, both yielding equivalent results when manipulated correctly. A participant questions the validity of a friend's alternative formulation, which lacks an equality sign but is ultimately confirmed to represent the same geodesic equation when multiplied by the metric tensor. This highlights the flexibility in expressing the geodesic equation while maintaining its fundamental properties.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity concepts
  • Familiarity with tensor calculus
  • Knowledge of the metric tensor and its properties
  • Proficiency in differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the geodesic equation in general relativity
  • Explore the implications of the metric tensor in curved spacetime
  • Learn about the role of Christoffel symbols in geodesic motion
  • Investigate alternative formulations of the geodesic equation
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, mathematicians, and students of general relativity seeking to deepen their understanding of geodesic equations and their various representations.

Jason Bennett
Messages
48
Reaction score
3
From Thomas Moore A General Relativity Workbook I have the geodesic equation as,

$$ 0=\frac{d}{d \tau} (g_{\alpha \beta} \frac{dx^\beta}{d \tau}) - \frac{1}{2} \partial_\alpha g_{\mu\nu} \frac{dx^\mu}{d \tau} \frac{dx^\nu}{d \tau} $$

as well as

$$ 0= \frac{d^2x^\gamma}{d \tau^2} + g^{\gamma\alpha} (\partial_\mu g_{\alpha\nu}-\frac{1}{2}\partial_\alpha g_{\mu\nu}) \frac{dx^\mu}{d \tau} \frac{dx^\nu}{d \tau}.
$$

However, I have a friend writing down the geodesic equation as

$$ g_{\alpha j}\frac{d^2x^j}{d \tau^2} + (\partial_i g_{\alpha j}-\frac{1}{2}\partial_\alpha g_{ij}) \frac{dx^j}{d \tau} \frac{dx^i}{d \tau}.
$$

and getting the right answers.

And I losing my mind? Is that equation the geodesic equation?!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your last equation is not an equation (there is no equality sign). Assuming you meant to write = 0, it is clearly the same equation as your others just multiplying by the metric.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
942
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 76 ·
3
Replies
76
Views
4K