Aluminum Propeller Design & Applications: Who to Contact?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sirmisko
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Aluminum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the design and application of a 1.2-meter diameter aluminum propeller, weighing approximately 1000 grams, intended for powered paragliders. Key considerations include operating at 2500 RPM with a testing threshold of 3800 RPM, using Al alloy 6061-T6, and generating thrust of 550N (54 kg). Participants emphasize the necessity of conducting thorough structural analysis and providing detailed design specifications before proceeding, noting that alternative materials like wood or carbon fiber may offer practical advantages.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of aluminum alloy properties, specifically Al alloy 6061-T6
  • Knowledge of propeller design principles and aerodynamics
  • Familiarity with structural analysis techniques for aerospace applications
  • Experience with material selection for lightweight construction
NEXT STEPS
  • Research structural analysis methods for propeller design
  • Explore the properties and applications of Al alloy 6061-T6 in aerospace
  • Investigate alternative materials such as carbon fiber and wood for propeller construction
  • Learn about thrust generation and performance testing for propellers
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, propeller designers, and hobbyists interested in lightweight aircraft design and material selection for performance optimization.

Sirmisko
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I had this posted in the wrong forum...srry :blushing:

I need to contact who ever would be authority on propeller design and applications.

In short, the Idea is to build a Aluminum prop, 1.2 meters diameter with weight of about 1000 grams. Targeted application would be primarily for powered para gliders. I need some arguments for and against before it leaves blueprint stage.

If you can point me in the right direction as to who the best contact for me would be, I would be ever so grateful.

If any of you have experience on the issue, comments are more than welcome.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
There are a lot of "depends" comments to be made here. What thrust? What RPM? What other loads are you expecting? What kind of stiffening are you using? Have you done ANY load analyses yet? etc...
 
- Operating @ 2500 rpm
- Should test to 3800 rpm.
- Continuous profle design
- Material Al alloy 6061-T6
- generating thrust 550n (54 kg)
 
OK. That's fine and all. However, how can anyone who has never seen what it is you are doing to tell you if it will work? That's YOUR job. You give extremely vague details. You give no decription of the design. You give no layout showing how you plan to assemble or build this. You give no reference on how you plan to reinforce it and where. What details you have given us are about as useful as what the color is going to be. Like I asked before, have you done ANY structural analysis on this design?

Instead of asking broad, unanswerable questions, do your own analysis and ask SPECIFIC questions regarding that analysis.
 
wood good old tree stuff
works better in that size
eazy to work and cheap

as an alloy prop will need to be hollow
to get a good foil shape at that weight
costly and hard to make

carbon fiber over foam core may work
if you hate wood
but cost is a lot more
for very little gain

stika spruce is the cheap eazy way to go
and has been used for years
and fun to work with
and requires common tools to shape
 
Some jet engine fan blades are designed this way. FWIW I spent several years writing software to do the stress and vibration analysis of them, since at the time the commercial programs (NASTRAN, ABAQUS etc) wouldn't do the job - they will do it now, but it ain't straightforward.

Unfortunately for you, that work was and still is a commercial secret - so don't ask for details!

FWIW it's no secret that the fan blade material was titanium not aluminum, and the manufacturing technique we used (eventually) was superplastic forming.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K