Aluminum Propeller Design & Applications: Who to Contact?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sirmisko
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Aluminum
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the design and application of an aluminum propeller, specifically a 1.2-meter diameter propeller intended for powered paragliders. Participants are exploring various aspects of propeller design, including material choices, structural analysis, and performance considerations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks guidance on who to contact regarding propeller design and requests arguments for and against their proposed aluminum propeller.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of specific details such as thrust, RPM, and load analyses, suggesting that vague information limits the ability to provide useful feedback.
  • A participant provides operational parameters, stating the propeller will operate at 2500 RPM and should be tested to 3800 RPM, generating a thrust of 550 N (54 kg) using aluminum alloy 6061-T6.
  • Concerns are raised about the lack of structural analysis and specific design details, with a suggestion that the original poster should conduct their own analysis before seeking broad feedback.
  • One participant argues for the use of wood as a material, suggesting it may be more effective and easier to work with than aluminum, while also noting the challenges of creating a hollow aluminum propeller.
  • A participant mentions experience with jet engine fan blades, highlighting that while their work involved stress and vibration analysis, the materials and techniques used were different, specifically titanium and superplastic forming.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on material choices and the necessity of detailed design analysis. There is no consensus on the best approach or material for the propeller, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal design strategy.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for specific design details and structural analysis, indicating that the discussion may be limited by the original poster's vague descriptions and lack of preliminary analysis.

Sirmisko
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I had this posted in the wrong forum...srry :blushing:

I need to contact who ever would be authority on propeller design and applications.

In short, the Idea is to build a Aluminum prop, 1.2 meters diameter with weight of about 1000 grams. Targeted application would be primarily for powered para gliders. I need some arguments for and against before it leaves blueprint stage.

If you can point me in the right direction as to who the best contact for me would be, I would be ever so grateful.

If any of you have experience on the issue, comments are more than welcome.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
There are a lot of "depends" comments to be made here. What thrust? What RPM? What other loads are you expecting? What kind of stiffening are you using? Have you done ANY load analyses yet? etc...
 
- Operating @ 2500 rpm
- Should test to 3800 rpm.
- Continuous profle design
- Material Al alloy 6061-T6
- generating thrust 550n (54 kg)
 
OK. That's fine and all. However, how can anyone who has never seen what it is you are doing to tell you if it will work? That's YOUR job. You give extremely vague details. You give no decription of the design. You give no layout showing how you plan to assemble or build this. You give no reference on how you plan to reinforce it and where. What details you have given us are about as useful as what the color is going to be. Like I asked before, have you done ANY structural analysis on this design?

Instead of asking broad, unanswerable questions, do your own analysis and ask SPECIFIC questions regarding that analysis.
 
wood good old tree stuff
works better in that size
eazy to work and cheap

as an alloy prop will need to be hollow
to get a good foil shape at that weight
costly and hard to make

carbon fiber over foam core may work
if you hate wood
but cost is a lot more
for very little gain

stika spruce is the cheap eazy way to go
and has been used for years
and fun to work with
and requires common tools to shape
 
Some jet engine fan blades are designed this way. FWIW I spent several years writing software to do the stress and vibration analysis of them, since at the time the commercial programs (NASTRAN, ABAQUS etc) wouldn't do the job - they will do it now, but it ain't straightforward.

Unfortunately for you, that work was and still is a commercial secret - so don't ask for details!

FWIW it's no secret that the fan blade material was titanium not aluminum, and the manufacturing technique we used (eventually) was superplastic forming.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K