Am I crazy or is my book wrong?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter yjl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Physics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers around a discrepancy in a physics textbook regarding the Klein-Gordon equation and the equation for a plane wave. The correct formulation is identified as ##\omega^2 = c^2 k^2 + c^2 \mu^2##, where ##k^2 = k_x^2 + k_y^2 + k_z^2##. Participants confirm that the absence of the term μ in the third equation is a mistake. The book in question is a LaTeX textbook authored by a professor, which is still in progress.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Klein-Gordon equation
  • Familiarity with wave equations in physics
  • Knowledge of LaTeX for formatting mathematical expressions
  • Basic concepts of wave vector notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the Klein-Gordon equation in detail
  • Study wave equations and their applications in physics
  • Learn how to use LaTeX for typesetting complex equations
  • Explore the implications of wave vector notation in different dimensions
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators developing course materials, and anyone involved in the review of academic texts for accuracy in scientific equations.

yjl
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hey all,

My book says/does the following.

Use the following equation for a plane wave
Aantekening 2019-09-07 020126.jpg

Fill it in the klein-gordon equation
Aantekening 2019-09-07 020112.jpg

To get
Aantekening 2019-09-07 020151.jpg

Which results in
Aantekening 2019-09-07 020201.jpg


Is this right? I got something different and no matter how hard I try I can't replicate the same answer. I've gotten the last equation, but without the c to the power of 4. I also feel like they just flat out forgot μ in the third equation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yjl said:
I've gotten the last equation, but without the c to the power of 4.
It should be ##\omega^2 = c^2 k^2 + c^2 \mu^2##, where ##k^2 = k_x^2 + k_y^2 + k_z^2##; if this is what you got then you did it correctly
yjl said:
I also feel like they just flat out forgot μ in the third equation.
Yes.

By the way, what book is this?

Jason
 
jasonRF said:
It should be ##\omega^2 = c^2 k^2 + c^2 \mu^2##, where ##k^2 = k_x^2 + k_y^2 + k_z^2##; if this is what you got then you did it correctly

Yes.

By the way, what book is this?

Jason
Yes, thank you!

That's what I kept ending up on. :-)

It's not a book that's publicly available. It's my professor's LaTeX book that he wrote for the course. He did say that it's still very much a work in progress, but still..
 
yjl said:
It's my professor's LaTeX book that he wrote for the course
I hope you'll tell him about this, politely. If it were me, I would appreciate the feedback. :oldwink:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and weirdoguy
jtbell said:
I hope you'll tell him about this, politely. If it were me, I would appreciate the feedback. :oldwink:
Yes, I e-mailed him. Wonder if he'll appreciate or find it annoying to be honest
 
yjl said:
Yes, I e-mailed him. Wonder if he'll appreciate or find it annoying to be honest

If he finds it annoying that someone pointed out a mistake in his text, then he has no business being a physicist, or an educator for that matter.

Zz.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, jrmichler, berkeman and 3 others

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
885
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
992