MHB Amanda's question at Yahoo Answers (Eigenvalues and eigenvectors)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fernando Revilla
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenvectors
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the eigenvectors corresponding to the eigenvalue λ = -1 for the given matrix A. The eigenvectors identified are (-1, 1, 0) and (-1, 0, 1), which are derived from the kernel of the matrix A + I. The confusion arises from the transformation of the matrix to its reduced form, which does not directly yield the eigenvectors. The calculations confirm that the eigenspace corresponding to λ = -1 has a dimension of 2, leading to the two identified eigenvectors. Understanding the relationship between eigenvalues and the kernel of the modified matrix is crucial for solving such problems.
Fernando Revilla
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
631
Reaction score
0
Here is the question:

So, I'm attempting to work on this question:

Given that matrix A =
0 1 1
1 0 1
1 1 0

and has λ = -1 as one of its eigenvalues, find the corresponding eigenvectors.

The answers are
-1
1
0

and

-1
0
1

BUT.. I don't understand how they got that because can't you bring it down to the reduced form of
1 0 0
0 1 0
0 0 1

So how do you get the corresponding eigenvalues from that? I'm so confused! Help please :)

Here is a link to the question:

How to I find corresponding eigenvectors? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Amanda,

I don't understand either how they got those eigenvalues, surely is a typo. Using the transformations $R_2\to R_2-R_1$, $R_3\to R_3-R_1$ and $C_1\to C_1+C_2+C_3$ we get: $$\begin{aligned}
\begin{vmatrix}{-\lambda}&{\;\;1}&{\;\;1}\\{\;\;1}&{-\lambda}&{\;\;1}\\{\;\;1}&{\;\;1}&{-\lambda}\end{vmatrix}&=\begin{vmatrix}{-\lambda}&{\;\;1}&{\;\;1}\\{\;\;1+\lambda}&{-\lambda}-1&{\;\;0}\\{\;\;1+\lambda}&{\;\;0}&{-\lambda-1}\end{vmatrix}\\&=\begin{vmatrix}{-\lambda+2}&{\;\;1}&{\;\;1}\\{\;\;0}&{-\lambda}-1&{\;\;0}\\{\;\;0}&{\;\;0}&{-\lambda-1}\end{vmatrix}\\&=(-\lambda+2)(\lambda+1)^2=0\\&\Leftrightarrow \lambda=2\mbox{ (simple) }\vee \;\lambda=-1\mbox{ (double) }
\end{aligned}$$ The eigenvectors are: $$\ker (A-2I)\equiv \left \{ \begin{matrix}-2x_1+x_2+x_3=0\\x_1-2x_2+x_3=0\\x_1+x_2-2x_3=0\end{matrix}\right. $$ As $\lambda=2$ is simple, $\dim(\ker(A-2I))=1$ and easily we find a basis of this eigenspace: $B_2=\{(1,1,1)\}$. On the other hand: $$\ker (A+I)\equiv \left \{ \begin{matrix}x_1+x_2+x_3=0\\x_1+x_2+x_3=0\\x_1+x_2+x_3=0\end{matrix}\right.$$ Now, $\dim(\ker(A+I))=3-\mbox{rank }(A+I)=3-1=2$ and easily we find a basis of this eigenspace: $B_{-1}=\{(-1,1,0),(-1,0,1)\}$.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top