High School Ambiguity w/ Newton's dot notation + vector-magnitudes

  • Thread starter Thread starter SiennaTheGr8
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dot Notation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion highlights the ambiguity that arises when using Newton's overdot notation for time-derivatives alongside boldface notation for vectors. Specifically, the notation ##\dot{v}## can be interpreted as either the time-derivative of speed or the magnitude of acceleration, leading to potential confusion. The consensus is to adhere to the convention where boldface denotes vectors and italics denote scalars, thus interpreting ##\dot{v}## as the time derivative of speed. To avoid sign errors, it is recommended to use ##|\ddot{\textbf{r}}|## for the magnitude of acceleration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's notation for derivatives
  • Familiarity with vector and scalar quantities
  • Knowledge of basic physics concepts related to motion
  • Experience with mathematical notation in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Newton's notation and its applications in classical mechanics
  • Study vector calculus and its implications in physics
  • Learn about common pitfalls in interpreting mathematical notation
  • Explore the effects of air resistance on projectile motion
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and professionals in mechanics who require clarity in mathematical notation and its implications in motion analysis.

SiennaTheGr8
Messages
512
Reaction score
207
Stumbled on a potential pitfall that can arise if you combine Newton's overdot notation (for time-derivatives) with boldface/non-boldface notation for vectors/vector-magnitudes.

Say you have ##\textbf{v}## for velocity and ##\dot{\textbf{v}}## for acceleration. Speed is then ##v## (magnitude of velocity vector), but what does ##\dot{v}## mean? There are two possible interpretations:

1) the time-derivative of speed ##v##
2) the magnitude of acceleration ##\dot{\textbf{v}}##

In most contexts there's probably little risk of confusion (#2 can often be safely assumed). But one must be particularly careful in the one-dimensional case, when #2 is the absolute value of #1 and either quantity might prove useful. The danger there is a dreaded sign error.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SiennaTheGr8 said:
Stumbled on a potential pitfall that can arise if you combine Newton's overdot notation (for time-derivatives) with boldface/non-boldface notation for vectors/vector-magnitudes.

Say you have ##\textbf{v}## for velocity and ##\dot{\textbf{v}}## for acceleration. Speed is then ##v## (magnitude of velocity vector), but what does ##\dot{v}## mean? There are two possible interpretations:

1) the time-derivative of speed ##v##
2) the magnitude of acceleration ##\dot{\textbf{v}}##

In most contexts there's probably little risk of confusion (#2 can often be safely assumed). But one must be particularly careful in the one-dimensional case, when #2 is the absolute value of #1 and either quantity might prove useful. The danger there is a dreaded sign error.
In my opinion one ought to stick to the convention that boldface means "vector" and italics means "scalar". So I would interpret ##\dot v## as the time derivative of the speed. If I wanted to express the magnitude of the acceleration, I would write ##\ddot r## or ##|\dot {\textbf {v}}|## or ##a## . However, your point is well taken as there are people who sometimes carelessly write expressions they don't really mean. The dreaded sign error that you mention is often seen in PF postings where there is vertical projectile motion with air resistance proportional to some power of the speed.

On edit: The correct magnitude of the acceleration should be ##|\ddot {\textbf {r}}|##.
 
Last edited:
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K