Is the Derivative of Speed the Magnitude of Acceleration?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter PFuser1232
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Speed Time
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the relationship between the derivative of speed and the magnitude of acceleration, particularly in the context of one-dimensional and multi-dimensional motion. Participants explore mathematical definitions and examples to clarify whether the first time derivative of speed equates to the magnitude of acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the first time derivative of velocity is acceleration, but question whether the first time derivative of speed is the magnitude of acceleration.
  • One participant provides a specific example with velocity as a function of time, concluding that the derivative of speed does not yield the magnitude of acceleration.
  • Others reference uniform circular motion as a counterexample, suggesting that the relationship does not hold in general.
  • Several participants argue that mathematically, the derivative of the absolute value of a function does not equal the absolute value of the derivative, supporting the claim that the first time derivative of speed is not the magnitude of acceleration.
  • One participant discusses the vector nature of velocity and acceleration, indicating uncertainty about the general relationship between the time derivative of speed and the magnitude of acceleration.
  • A later reply emphasizes that the time derivative of speed is not generally related to the magnitude of acceleration, noting that equality may only occur under specific conditions.
  • Another participant provides a mathematical derivation to illustrate the conditions under which the time derivative of speed equals the magnitude of acceleration, suggesting that it may only be true in limited scenarios.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on whether the first time derivative of speed is the magnitude of acceleration. Multiple competing views remain, with some supporting the claim that they are not equivalent and others suggesting that specific cases may allow for equality.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the discussion is limited by the assumptions made about the nature of velocity and acceleration, particularly in one-dimensional versus multi-dimensional contexts. The mathematical steps involved in the derivations are also acknowledged as potentially unresolved.

PFuser1232
Messages
479
Reaction score
20
The first time derivative of velocity is acceleration. Can we then conclude that the first time derivative of speed is the magnitude of acceleration? In the following example I will consider a one dimensional case, for the sake of argument. Suppose the velocity v of a particle as a function of time t is given by v(t) = t^2. The acceleration, a, as a function of t is therefore given by a(t) = 2t. And so the magnitude of acceleration (the absolute value, since we are dealing with a one dimensional case as I have previously stated) is a "piece-wise defined function of t", namely 2|t|. That's observation A.
Now, let's go back to velocity. Since |v(t)| = v(t), we can then conclude that the derivative of speed as a function of time is given by d/dt(|v(t)|) = 2t; which, technically speaking, is not the same as |a(t)|. So am I right in my conclusion that differentiating speed does not yield the magnitude of acceleration?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MohammedRady97 said:
The first time derivative of velocity is acceleration. Can we then conclude that the first time derivative of speed is the magnitude of acceleration?
No. See uniform circular motion.

MohammedRady97 said:
In the following example I will consider a one dimensional case, for the sake of argument.
That's a special case then. Not true in general.
 
A.T. said:
No. See uniform circular motion.


That's a special case then. Not true in general.

But the example I gave helped make the point that differentiating speed w.r.t. time does not yield the magnitude of acceleration. Or do you mean that I am wrong in this conclusion?
 
To sum it all up:
Mathematically, d|f(x)|/dx \neq |df(x)/dx|. Ergo the first time derivative of speed is not the magnitude of acceleration, am I right?
 
MohammedRady97 said:
Or do you mean that I am wrong in this conclusion?
No, you are right.
 
dv/dt in general does not equal the magnitude of acceleration.
generally v is a vector with several components and the derivative is also a vector with several components. I don't readily know if d|v|/dt = |dv/dt| is true or false, but I would assume not.
There might be some special cases where it is true.
 
Aren't we certain that d|v|/dt =/= |dv/dt|?

|v(t)| = v(t)
and the derivative of v(t) is a(t)
Then the derivative of |v(t)| would also be a(t)
a(t) is not |a(t)|
Therefore, the derivative of |v(t)| is not |a(t)|.

So we know they aren't the same. Correct me if I have any mistakes.


That seems to be the problem,
I think MohammadRady97 is spot on. The magnitude of the acceleration is |df(x)/dx| but you, OP, tried to do d|f(x)|/dx, which as MohammadRady said (and I've shown explicitly above) are not the same thing.
 
Wittyname6 said:
Aren't we certain that d|v|/dt =/= |dv/dt|?

|v(t)| = v(t)
and the derivative of v(t) is a(t)
Then the derivative of |v(t)| would also be a(t)
a(t) is not |a(t)|
Therefore, the derivative of |v(t)| is not |a(t)|.

So we know they aren't the same. Correct me if I have any mistakes.


That seems to be the problem,
I think MohammadRady97 is spot on. The magnitude of the acceleration is |df(x)/dx| but you, OP, tried to do d|f(x)|/dx, which as MohammadRady said (and I've shown explicitly above) are not the same thing.

Exactly. The time derivative of speed is, in general, by no means related to the magnitude of acceleration. It just so happens that in some cases they're both equal. (A mathematical coincidence, if you will.)
 
I got bored. I think this is overkill. You're all welcome.

Wittyname6 said:
|v(t)| = v(t)
and the derivative of v(t) is a(t)
Then the derivative of |v(t)| would also be a(t)
a(t) is not |a(t)|
Therefore, the derivative of |v(t)| is not |a(t)|.
This logic doesn't sit well with me. Let's just do the math

Say \vec{v}(t)=f(t)\hat{\textbf{i}}+g(t)\hat{\textbf{j}}

|v(t)|=\sqrt{[f(t)]^2+[g(t)]^2}

then

\vec{a}(t) = \frac{dv}{dt}(t)=\frac{df}{dt}\hat{\textbf{i}}+\frac{dg}{dt}\hat{ \textbf{ j}}

where

|a(t)|=|\frac{dv}{dt}(t)|=\sqrt{\left(\frac{df}{dt}\right)^2+\left( \frac{dg}{dt} \right)^2}

and

\frac{d|v|}{dt}(t)=\frac{1}{2}\left( [f(t)]^2+[g(t)]^2\right)^{-1/2}\left[2f(t)\frac{df}{dt}+2g(t)\frac{dg}{dt}\right]


If you try and solve |a(t)| = \frac{d|v|}{dt}

you find that this is only true if

\left(f(t)\frac{dg}{dt}\right)^2 + \left(g(t)\frac{df}{dt}\right)^2 = f(t)g(t)(\frac{df}{dt})(\frac{dg}{dt})

or

\frac{f(t)}{g(t)}\frac{dg/dt}{df/dt}+\frac{g(t)}{f(t)}\frac{df/dt}{dg/dt} = 1


Therefore, the time derivative of |v(t)| is not |a(t)| unless that condition is met. Through a little guessing, the only solutions I've found are when either f or g = 0, or f and g are constants.


I hope this clears everything up.
 
  • #10
elegysix said:
I got bored. I think this is overkill. You're all welcome.


This logic doesn't sit well with me. Let's just do the math

Say \vec{v}(t)=f(t)\hat{\textbf{i}}+g(t)\hat{\textbf{j}}

|v(t)|=\sqrt{[f(t)]^2+[g(t)]^2}

then

\vec{a}(t) = \frac{dv}{dt}(t)=\frac{df}{dt}\hat{\textbf{i}}+\frac{dg}{dt}\hat{ \textbf{ j}}

where

|a(t)|=|\frac{dv}{dt}(t)|=\sqrt{\left(\frac{df}{dt}\right)^2+\left( \frac{dg}{dt} \right)^2}

and

\frac{d|v|}{dt}(t)=\frac{1}{2}\left( [f(t)]^2+[g(t)]^2\right)^{-1/2}\left[2f(t)\frac{df}{dt}+2g(t)\frac{dg}{dt}\right]


If you try and solve |a(t)| = \frac{d|v|}{dt}

you find that this is only true if

\left(f(t)\frac{dg}{dt}\right)^2 + \left(g(t)\frac{df}{dt}\right)^2 = f(t)g(t)(\frac{df}{dt})(\frac{dg}{dt})

or

\frac{f(t)}{g(t)}\frac{dg/dt}{df/dt}+\frac{g(t)}{f(t)}\frac{df/dt}{dg/dt} = 1


Therefore, the time derivative of |v(t)| is not |a(t)| unless that condition is met. Through a little guessing, the only solutions I've found are when either f or g = 0, or f and g are constants.


I hope this clears everything up.

Yeah. But just to be clear, aren't f and g the respective x- and y-components of velocity?
 
  • #11
yes, f(t) and g(t) are the x and y components of velocity. I was lazy some and used f and g, but they are the same thing. Recall that the derivative of speed you were asking about is \frac{d}{dt}\left(|v(t)|\right), and the magnitude of acceleration is |dv/dt|, so that's why the answer is in components of the velocity.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
4K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K