AMD vs Intel: Choose the Better CPU for Optimal Performance

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saint
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around comparing AMD and Intel CPUs in terms of overall performance, particularly in the context of 64-bit processing and their suitability for various applications such as gaming and media encoding. Participants explore the implications of architectural differences, historical performance trends, and personal experiences with both brands.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express a preference for AMD due to better price-to-performance ratios, especially for gaming and specific applications.
  • Others argue that Intel processors are more stable and better suited for corporate environments, citing concerns about overheating and reliability.
  • There is a discussion about the historical context of the instruction sets used by both AMD and Intel, with some participants criticizing the legacy of the 8086 architecture.
  • Some participants note that the transition to 64-bit processing complicates comparisons between the two brands, with differing opinions on the current utility of 64-bit technology.
  • A few participants mention personal experiences with specific AMD and Intel models, highlighting performance differences in real-world usage.
  • There are conflicting views on the stability of AMD processors compared to Intel, with some asserting that AMD CPUs can be less reliable under certain conditions.
  • Concerns are raised about the slow adoption of 64-bit processing in mainstream applications, with some participants questioning the necessity of 64-bit technology for average users.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on which CPU brand is superior, as multiple competing views remain regarding performance, stability, and the relevance of 64-bit processing. The discussion reflects a range of opinions and experiences without a definitive resolution.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the current state of 64-bit processors and their practical applications. There are also references to the historical context of CPU design and performance metrics, which may not fully capture the current technological landscape.

  • #31
russ_watters said:
Barton. Its a little more than a year old. I'm happy with the overclock I'm getting, but I sscrewed up with the motherboard choice: I have an Epox 8rda and its fsb is nowhere near as overclockable as the 8rda+. 190 is my max depending on timings.
still very nice CPU..

I have a 2400 barton running 2.4GHz, but they are not the good ones, what I would like as in AMD would be a 2500 Barton Mobile, with multiplier unlocked..
Got the 2.4GHz up to 3.2GHz on my ASUS board, but I need better mem.
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
  • #32
anyone use VIA or Transmeta ?
 
  • #33
I've had my 1.4ghz Thunderbird for quite awhile now, and I'm *very* satisfied when it comes to performance. Over the years that I've had it, I've seen it outrun a few Pentium 3 and first-generation Pentium 4 processors.

A few years ago, I would've saved Intel for servers and high-end workstations (dual Pentium 3 Xeons are awesome, I know). Now that AMD has the Opteron, my next workstation will be an dual Opterons, of course.
 
  • #34
Saint said:
anyone use VIA or Transmeta ?
yuppers, got a VIA C3 650MHz in my server with a passive cooler, and runs 29c when transfering files for two days and folding..
 
  • #35
BigStarFish said:
Do you able to tell me what VIA is you are telling ?

Sorry Being interupting. I have really deep interste in computer chunks and links.
:wink:
not a problem, I am glad you are taking interest..
VIA is the third place competitor in the CPU market, mostly being used for blade servers, etc...
They are the coolest running CPU on market, usually only wanting a passive cooler, and somtimes, like in blade servers, no cooler at all..
My C3 is a Samual core, witha 100MHz bus, with a multiplier of 6.5x.
Here is a 1GHz version(not samual)(it is an ezra), it is on par with the performance of a 600MHz P3, but the C3 does not need any good cooling, I just recommend a passive heatsink..
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applicat...CP2-V450-1000 C&SRCCODE=NEXTAG&CMP=EMC-NEXTAG
 
Last edited:
  • #36
I don't see the big debate. Athlon 64+ 3800 is the best you're going to get at this point and time. If you like Intel or you need it for encoding, office use, etc. then get the Intel P4-560 3.6GHz. Stop debating, and start saving money. :p
 
  • #37
dekoi said:
I don't see the big debate. Athlon 64+ 3800 is the best you're going to get at this point and time. If you like Intel or you need it for encoding, office use, etc. then get the Intel P4-560 3.6GHz. Stop debating, and start saving money. :p
AMD opteron fx53 is the best for now(2.4GHz)
and that "technically" competes with a 3.8GHz P4

but there are http://alexrushing.com/miscpictures/megaownage2.jpg

btw, we were talking about via..^.^
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #38
you want to see what you can do with the best componets out there go to www.go-l.com and look around

of course this is assuming price is of no consequence but they are some of the best comps possible
 
  • #39
that is some sick stuff, and a cool web design
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
13K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K