Ammonia is a strong or weak field ligand?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around whether ammonia (NH3) is classified as a strong or weak field ligand within the context of coordination chemistry, particularly in relation to the complex [Ni(NH3)4Cl2]. Participants explore the implications of ammonia's position in the spectrochemical series and its effect on the spin states of the complex.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that ammonia is located near the middle of the spectrochemical series, prompting the question of its classification as a strong or weak field ligand.
  • Participants discuss the complex [Ni(NH3)4Cl2], highlighting that chloride is a weak field ligand and questioning whether this leads to a high spin or low spin configuration.
  • There are requests to draw d-orbital configurations for Ni(II) in both high spin and low spin states, with observations about the electron distribution in these configurations.
  • One participant corrects earlier claims about the number of d electrons in high-spin Ni(II), indicating a need for precision in the electron count.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of Hund’s Rule in the context of filling d orbitals.
  • A later reply suggests that for certain electron configurations (d0 through d3 and d8 through d10), the filling of d orbitals does not depend on spin states, but acknowledges that this is specific to octahedral complexes.
  • One participant proposes examining the case of hexamminecobalt(III) as an example where NH3 appears to act as a strong field ligand, indicating that it leads to low-spin configurations in certain scenarios.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the classification of ammonia as a ligand, with some suggesting it is a strong field ligand based on specific examples, while others remain uncertain or propose that it may vary depending on the context of the complex.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved aspects regarding the definitions of strong and weak field ligands, as well as the specific conditions under which ammonia's behavior may change based on the metal center and geometry of the complex.

Wrichik Basu
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
2,186
Reaction score
2,694
Ammonia is present in the spectrochemical series near the middle, just after water. Is it a strong field ligand, or a weak field ligand?

Also, take into consideration the complex ##[Ni(NH_3)_4 Cl_2]##. Chloride ion is towards the left end of the spectrochemical series which means it is a weak field ligand. Will the complex be a high spin or a low spin one?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Curious tomato
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Wrichik Basu said:
Also, take into consideration the complex [Ni(NH3)4Cl2][Ni(NH3)4Cl2][Ni(NH_3)_4 Cl_2]. Chloride ion is towards the left end of the spectrochemical series which means it is a weak field ligand. Will the complex be a high spin or a low spin one?
Draw out the d-orbital configurations for Ni(II) high spin and low spin. What do you notice?
 
TeethWhitener said:
Draw out the d-orbital configurations for Ni(II) high spin and low spin. What do you notice?
Ni(II) has 8 electrons in its 3d-orbital.

For low-spin complex:
##t_{2g}: d_{xy}^2 \, d_{yz}^2 \, d_{xz}^2##
##e_g: d_{x^2-y^2}^2 \, d_{z^2}^0##

For high-spin complex:
##t_{2g}: d_{xy}^2 \, d_{yz}^2 \, d_{xz}^2##
##e_g: d_{x^2-y^1}^2 \, d_{z^2}^1##

What conclusion can I draw from these?
 
Not that high-spin Ni(II) has nine d electrons, certainly.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: baldbrain and TeethWhitener
Also remember Hund’s Rule.
 
My mistake. Corrected ones:

For low-spin complex:
##t_{2g}: d_{xy}^2 \, d_{yz}^2 \, d_{xz}^2##
##e_g: d_{x^2-y^2}^1 \, d_{z^2}^1##

For high-spin complex:
##t_{2g}: d_{xy}^2 \, d_{yz}^2 \, d_{xz}^2##
##e_g: d_{x^2-y^1}^1 \, d_{z^2}^1##

Both are same. Understood. Thanks @TeethWhitener

What about the first question:

Wrichik Basu said:
Ammonia is present in the spectrochemical series near the middle, just after water. Is it a strong field ligand, or a weak field ligand?
 
Yes. For d0 through d3 and d8 through d10, there's really only one way to fill the d orbital states (EDIT: this is only true for octahedral complexes--once the geometry changes, the rules change), so high-spin vs. low-spin isn't a factor.
Wrichik Basu said:
What about the first question:
One way to do this is to look at a case where the spin states do matter (d4 through d7) and see whether the ammine complexes are low-spin or high-spin. Looking at hexamminecobalt(III), you have a d6 cobalt center that's octahedral and low-spin, so this suggests that NH3 is a reasonably strong field ligand.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: baldbrain and Wrichik Basu

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
64K