Amplitude of Feynman diagram in ##\phi^4## interactions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the amplitude of a Feynman diagram in momentum space for ##\phi^4## theory, as presented in "Quantum Field Theory for Gifted Amateurs" by Tom Lancaster. The user initially included four momentum terms in their calculation but later learned that only two are necessary due to momentum conservation principles. The correct amplitude expression is derived using the Dirac delta function and integrating over the independent momentum variables, ##k_2## and ##k_4##, while eliminating the others.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Feynman diagrams in quantum field theory
  • Familiarity with momentum conservation laws
  • Knowledge of the Dirac delta function in physics
  • Basic concepts of ##\phi^4## theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Feynman rules of quantum electrodynamics (QED), particularly the conservation of momentum
  • Learn about the Dirac delta function's role in quantum field theory calculations
  • Explore advanced topics in ##\phi^4## theory, including perturbation theory
  • Review section 7.3 of "Mandl & Shaw" for detailed explanations on momentum conservation in Feynman diagrams
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, particularly those studying quantum field theory, researchers working on particle interactions, and anyone interested in mastering Feynman diagram calculations.

snypehype46
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Calculate the amplitude of this Feynman diagram in momentum space for $\phi^4$ theory
Relevant Equations
None
This is not really homework assigned to me but I wasn't sure where to post this.
I'm trying to work through the book "Quantum Field Theory for Gifted Amateurs" by Tom Lancaster. I'm doing the questions on Chapter 19 to understand how to draw Feynman diagrams and work out their amplitude. One of the exercises involved the computation of the amplitude of the following Feynman diagram in momentum space:

1618684723670.png

What I got was the following:

$$2\pi ^4 \delta^{(4)} (p_1+p_2- q_1 -q_2) \frac{(-i \lambda)^3}{4} \int {\frac{d^4 k_1 d^4 k_2 d^4 k_3 d^4k_4}{(2\pi)^16}}
\frac{i}{k_1^2 -m^2 +i\epsilon}
\frac{i}{k_2^2 -m^2 +i\epsilon} \times \\
\frac{i}{(p_1 +p_2 - k_3)^2 -m^2 +i\epsilon}
\frac{i}{(p_1 +p_2 - k_4)^2 -m^2 +i\epsilon}
$$

This is the diagram I drew to compute this

1618684739554.png


But it turns that the correct solution should be

$$2\pi ^4 \delta^{(4)} (p_1+p_2- q_1 -q_2) \frac{(-i \lambda)^3}{4} \int {\frac{d^4 k_1 d^4 k_2}{(2\pi)^8}}
\frac{i}{k_1^2 -m^2 +i\epsilon}
\frac{i}{k_2^2 -m^2 +i\epsilon} \times \\
\frac{i}{(p_1 +p_2 - k_1)^2 -m^2 +i\epsilon}
\frac{i}{(p_1 +p_2 - k_2)^2 -m^2 +i\epsilon}
$$

I don't quite get how to get rid of the ##k_3## and ##k_4## terms as they did in the solution. I assume this is due to the conservation of momentum but I'm not sure.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
snypehype46 said:
Homework Statement:: Calculate the amplitude of this Feynman diagram in momentum space for $\phi^4$ theory
Relevant Equations:: None

This is not really homework assigned to me but I wasn't sure where to post this.
I'm trying to work through the book "Quantum Field Theory for Gifted Amateurs" by Tom Lancaster. I'm doing the questions on Chapter 19 to understand how to draw Feynman diagrams and work out their amplitude. One of the exercises involved the computation of the amplitude of the following Feynman diagram in momentum space:

View attachment 281695
What I got was the following:

$$2\pi ^4 \delta^{(4)} (p_1+p_2- q_1 -q_2) \frac{(-i \lambda)^3}{4} \int {\frac{d^4 k_1 d^4 k_2 d^4 k_3 d^4k_4}{(2\pi)^16}}
\frac{i}{k_1^2 -m^2 +i\epsilon}
\frac{i}{k_2^2 -m^2 +i\epsilon} \times \\
\frac{i}{(p_1 +p_2 - k_3)^2 -m^2 +i\epsilon}
\frac{i}{(p_1 +p_2 - k_4)^2 -m^2 +i\epsilon}
$$

This is the diagram I drew to compute this

View attachment 281696

But it turns that the correct solution should be

$$2\pi ^4 \delta^{(4)} (p_1+p_2- q_1 -q_2) \frac{(-i \lambda)^3}{4} \int {\frac{d^4 k_1 d^4 k_2}{(2\pi)^8}}
\frac{i}{k_1^2 -m^2 +i\epsilon}
\frac{i}{k_2^2 -m^2 +i\epsilon} \times \\
\frac{i}{(p_1 +p_2 - k_1)^2 -m^2 +i\epsilon}
\frac{i}{(p_1 +p_2 - k_2)^2 -m^2 +i\epsilon}
$$

I don't quite get how to get rid of the ##k_3## and ##k_4## terms as they did in the solution. I assume this is due to the conservation of momentum but I'm not sure.
In your Feynman diagram, ##k_1## and ##k_2## are not completely independent due to momentum conservation. The same goes for ##k_3## and ##k_4## as well. I guess ##k_1## and ##k_2## in the final "correct" solution denote different momentum lines compared to those in the Feynman diagram you draw.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: snypehype46
The "trick" is to ask yourself the question "how many four-momentum terms can be fixed by energy-momentum conservation?"

Note that in your particular example you have 3 vertices, where energy-momentum conservation holds. Based on your notation, from left to right we get ##p_1+p_2 = k_1 + k_2, \quad k_1 + k_2 = k_3 + k_4, \quad k_3 + k_4 = q_1 + q_2## (and do not forget ##p_1+p_2 = q_1+ q_2## due to the Dirac delta function. However, your confusion is not related directly to the Dirac delta so let's focus on the vertices instead).

You have ##4## internal momentum terms. The question is: how many of those can you rewrite in terms of others via energy-momentum conservation? With the above equations you can see the answer is two and the and the term associated to the diagram reads (I chose to leave ##k_2## and ##k_4## as the independent ones)

\begin{equation*}
2\pi ^4 \delta^{(4)} (q_1+q_2- p_1 -p_2) \frac{(-i \lambda)^3}{4} \int {\frac{d^4 k_2 d^4 k_4}{(2\pi)^8}}
\frac{i}{k_2^2 -m^2 +i\epsilon}
\frac{i}{k_4^2 -m^2 +i\epsilon} \times \\
\frac{i}{(p_1 +p_2 - k_2)^2 -m^2 +i\epsilon}
\frac{i}{(p_1 +p_2 - k_4)^2 -m^2 +i\epsilon}
\end{equation*}

PS: If you are not acquainted with asking yourself how many momentum terms are fixed, I recommend you study the Feynman rules of QED and in particular the rule that deals with such question. For instance, you can find it in Mandl & Shaw, section 7.3 (the rule of your interest is 7.).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: snypehype46

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
695
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K