An actual first-order formulation of ZFC?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mpitluk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Zfc
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 2K views
mpitluk
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Can someone point me to a first-order axiomatization of ZFC?

As I've mostly seen ZFC expressed in higher-order logics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ZFC is a first order theory, where have you been seeing second order formulations? I'm sure every one of the top Google results for "ZFC axioms" will give you a first order formulation. In particular, Wikipedia.
 
mpitluk said:
Can someone point me to a first-order axiomatization of ZFC?

As I've mostly seen ZFC expressed in higher-order logics.
The higher-order axioms are replaced with axiom schema. e.g. the axiom schema of subsets is collection of statements
{x in A | P(x)} is a set,​
one for every unary predicate P in the language of first-order set theory.First-order ZFC requires infinitely many axioms to specify. First-order NBG, however, is an 'equivalent' set theory in an important sense, but only requires finitely many axioms.