Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

An ambiguity in the definition of tensors

  1. Mar 9, 2012 #1

    Shayan.J

    User Avatar
    Insights Author
    Gold Member

    One of the definitions of the tensors says that they are multidimensional arrays of numbers which transform in a certain form under coordinate transformations.No restriction is considered on the coordinate systems involved.So I thought they should transform as such not only under rotations but also under transformation from cartesian to plane polar coordinates,so I tried it on the contravariant tensor below:
    [itex] \left(\begin{array}{cc}-xy&-y^{2}\\x^{2}&xy\end{array}\right) [/itex]
    But I got zero for all four elements.I got confused then I thought maybe curvilinear coordinates are somehow different from cartesian.Is it correct?If not,what's the reason?
    thanks
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 12, 2012 #2

    quasar987

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Maybe you can show us your computations.
     
  4. Mar 12, 2012 #3

    Shayan.J

    User Avatar
    Insights Author
    Gold Member

    [itex] r= \sqrt {x^2+y^2}[/itex]
    [itex] \theta=tan^{-1}{\frac{y}{x}}[/itex]

    [itex] \frac {\partial r} {\partial x} = \frac {x}{\sqrt {x^2+y^2}} [/itex]
    [itex] \frac {\partial r} {\partial y} = \frac {y}{\sqrt {x^2+y^2}} [/itex]
    [itex] \frac{\partial \theta}{\partial x}=\frac {-y}{x^2+y^2}[/itex]
    [itex] \frac{\partial \theta}{\partial y}=\frac {x}{x^2+y^2}[/itex]

    And then I used the transformation rule below and the partial derivatives above:

    [itex] A^{' kl} = \frac {\partial x^{' k}} {\partial x^{i}} \frac {\partial x^{' l}} {\partial x^{j}} A^{ij} [/itex]

    I calculate one of them here:

    [itex]

    A^{' 11}=( \frac {x}{\sqrt {x^2+y^2}} )^2 \times (-xy) + \frac {x}{\sqrt {x^2+y^2}} \times \frac {y}{\sqrt {x^2+y^2}} \times (-y^2) + \frac {x}{\sqrt {x^2+y^2}} \times \frac {y}{\sqrt {x^2+y^2}} \times x^2 + ( \frac {y}{\sqrt {x^2+y^2}} )^2 \times xy =0

    [/itex]

    I did the calculations several times,I'm sure there was nothing wrong with them.
     
    Last edited: Mar 12, 2012
  5. Mar 16, 2012 #4
    There are different types of tensors. If you're only worried about how your objects transform between cartesian coordinate systems, then you'll define what you mean by a tensor in terms of orthogonal transformations (and you'll get Cartesian tensors). On the other hand, if you're interested in considering how objects transform under general coordinate transformations, you'll define a tensors (or general tensor) by the transformations of the components as you did above.

    Now, not all collections of components will be tensors. Maybe the matrix you defined above doesn't represent the components of a general tensor?
     
  6. Mar 16, 2012 #5

    Shayan.J

    User Avatar
    Insights Author
    Gold Member

    Thanks
    Now the question is,how can I understand that?
     
  7. Mar 17, 2012 #6
    How do you mean understand?

    Tensors are defined as things that transform like [itex]T_{a,b}=\frac{ \partial x^n}{\partial x^a}\frac{ \partial x^m}{\partial x^b}T'_{n,m}[/itex] or the other way if it's mixed or contravariant. If it doesn't transform like this then it isn't a tensor.
    There's nothing to really 'understand' about it, it's just a definition, things that don't transform like tensors aren't tensors!
     
  8. Mar 17, 2012 #7

    Shayan.J

    User Avatar
    Insights Author
    Gold Member

    Ok.That's right.
    But the matrix I've given in my first posts,transforms as a contravariant tensor under rotations but gives zero under transformation from cartesian to polar coordinates.
    That's what I wanna know the reason.
     
  9. Mar 17, 2012 #8
    I went through your calculation as well, your transformation rule seems correct...

    Maybe the problem is that your coordinate matrix has determinant 0, but I don't see why it's wrong.
     
  10. Mar 17, 2012 #9

    Shayan.J

    User Avatar
    Insights Author
    Gold Member

    What you mean by coordinate matrix?
    I just know one matrix relating this and that's the Jacobian which does not have zero determinant here.
    I think if we analyze another tensor which works well here,we can find the wrong thing.
     
  11. Mar 17, 2012 #10
    Well, [itex] \left(\begin{array}{cc}-xy&-y^{2}\\x^{2}&xy\end{array}\right) [/itex] has determinant zero. It probably doens't play any role here, but I´m not an expert.

    If we took [itex] \left(\begin{array}{cc}x&y\\y&x\end{array}\right) [/itex], it would be

    [itex]

    A^{' 11}=( \frac {x}{\sqrt {x^2+y^2}} )^2 \times x + \frac {x}{\sqrt {x^2+y^2}} \times \frac {y}{\sqrt {x^2+y^2}} \times y + \frac {x}{\sqrt {x^2+y^2}} \times \frac {y}{\sqrt {x^2+y^2}} \times y + ( \frac {y}{\sqrt {x^2+y^2}} )^2 \times x

    [/itex]

    which obviously is not zero. So it seems to be as unfortunate choice of tensor and coordinate system. But still, it is wierd. If we tried coordinate transformation to polar coordinates and back to cartesian, result would be zero. Which is wrong.
     
  12. Mar 17, 2012 #11

    HallsofIvy

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    You have yet to give any reason why you think that is a tensor!
     
  13. Mar 18, 2012 #12

    Shayan.J

    User Avatar
    Insights Author
    Gold Member

    Very good point HallsofIvy.
    Just the professor at university told that it is a tensor and has done the transformation for rotations and it proved to be a tensor under rotations.
    Maybe its not a tensor because it does not work well under this kind of transformation.
    So very unfortunate choice.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Similar Discussions: An ambiguity in the definition of tensors
  1. Tensors and Tensors (Replies: 7)

  2. Basis ambiguity (Replies: 8)

Loading...