An approximate solution to the Van der Pauw equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter smithg86
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Approximate
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around approximating the function f in the context of the Van der Pauw equation for resistivity, particularly when the ratio R_1 / R_2 is approximately 1000. The original poster expresses uncertainty about how to begin the problem and references the Van der Pauw equation and its approximations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of the approximation provided in the Van der Pauw paper, questioning its accuracy for large ratios of R_1 to R_2. There are inquiries about the value of the expression (R_1 - R_2) / (R_1 + R_2) when R_1 is significantly larger than R_2, and whether a Taylor series method can be applied to find an approximate solution.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants exploring different aspects of the problem. Some have offered thoughts on using a Taylor series despite the transcendental nature of the equation, while others are still contemplating the best approach to take.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted concern regarding the accuracy of the approximation when R_1 is much larger than R_2, which may affect the validity of the methods being considered.

smithg86
Messages
58
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


question: approximate the function f if the ratio R_1 / R_2 is about 1000.

given:
the van der pauw equation for resistivity:
\rho = ( pi * d / ln[2] ) * (R_1 + R_2})/2 * f(R_1 / R_2),

where f is a function of the ratio R_1/R_2 only and satisfies the relation:

(R_1- R_2)/(R_1+R_2) = f arccosh{exp(ln[2]/f) / 2}.

from van der pauw's 1958 paper:if R_1 and R_2 are almost equal, f can be approximated by the formula

f ~ 1 - [ (R_1 - R_2) / (R_1 + R_2) ]^2 * ln[2] / 2 - [(R_1 - R_2)/(R_1 + R_2)]^4 * {(ln[2])^2 / 4 - (ln[2])^3 / 12}.

Homework Equations


-

The Attempt at a Solution


I have no idea how to start this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
smithg86 said:
from van der pauw's 1958 paper: if R_1 and R_2 are almost equal[/color], f can be approximated by the formula

f ~ 1 - [ (R_1 - R_2) / (R_1 + R_2) ]^2 * ln[2] / 2 - [(R_1 - R_2)/(R_1 + R_2)]^4 * {(ln[2])^2 / 4 - (ln[2])^3 / 12}.

That approximation doesn't seem like it would be very accurate when [itex]R_1=1000R_2[/itex]!:wink:


I have no idea how to start this.

What does [itex]\frac{R_1-R_2}{R_1+R_2}[/itex] equal when [itex]\frac{R_1}{R_2}=1000[/itex]?
 
What does [itex]\frac{R_1-R_2}{R_1+R_2}[/itex] equal when [itex]\frac{R_1}{R_2}=1000[/itex]?[/QUOTE]

It's 999/1001. But I don't know how to apply that to find an approximate solution. How do you go about finding an approximate solution to that, or any other function?
 
I can't seem to solve the equation explicitly for f (I think it's transcendental). Can I still use the Taylor series method?
 
Yes, it is transcendental, but I think you can still use a Taylor series. However, at the moment I can't think of exactly what expression your going to want to expand to make things easiest...I'll give it some more thought in the morning, but in the meantime hopefully someone else will jump in.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
15K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
8K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K