MHB An Artinian integral domain is a field

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

An Artinian integral domain, denoted as R, is proven to be a field when any non-zero element a in R is shown to be a unit. The sequence of ideals (a) ⊇ (a²) ⊇ (a³) ⊇ ... leads to the conclusion that there exists a k in R such that (a^k) = (a^{k+1}), implying that a^k = a^{k+1}m for some m in R. Since R is an integral domain, the cancellation property confirms that 1 = a·m, establishing that every non-zero element in R is indeed a unit.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Artinian rings and their properties
  • Knowledge of integral domains and their characteristics
  • Familiarity with ideal theory in ring theory
  • Basic grasp of cancellation laws in algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Artinian rings in more depth
  • Explore the implications of integral domains being fields
  • Learn about the structure of units in rings
  • Investigate examples of Artinian integral domains and their applications
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebraists, and students studying ring theory, particularly those interested in the properties of Artinian rings and integral domains.

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

I want to show that an Artinian integral domain is a field.

Let $R$ be an Artinian integral domain and $a\in R$ with $a\neq 0$.
Can we take then the sequence $(a)\supseteq (a)^2\supseteq (a^3)\supseteq \dots $ ? (Wondering)

Since $R$ is an Artinian integral domain we have that $\exists k\in R$ such that $(a^k)=(a^{k+1})$, i.e., $a^k\in (a^k)=(a^{k+1})\Rightarrow a^k=a^{k+1}m$ for some $m\in R$.
We have that $a^k=a^{k+1}m\Rightarrow a^k=a^k\cdot a\cdot m \Rightarrow a^k\cdot 1=a^k\cdot (a\cdot m)$.
Since $a\neq 0$, we have that $a^n\neq 0$ since $R$ is an integral domain, right? (Wondering)
Do we conclude from the last equation that $1=a\cdot m$ ? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In an integral domain, if:

$ar = as$ for $a \neq 0$, then we have:

$a(r - s) = 0$, and since $a \neq 0$, we must have $r - s = 0$, that is: $r = s$.

So, yes (we can "cancel" non-zero terms on each side of an equation).
 
Deveno said:
In an integral domain, if:

$ar = as$ for $a \neq 0$, then we have:

$a(r - s) = 0$, and since $a \neq 0$, we must have $r - s = 0$, that is: $r = s$.

So, yes (we can "cancel" non-zero terms on each side of an equation).

Ah ok... I see... (Nod)
mathmari said:
Let $R$ be an Artinian integral domain and $a\in R$ with $a\neq 0$.
Can we take then the sequence $(a)\supseteq (a)^2\supseteq (a^3)\supseteq \dots $ ? (Wondering)

Can we just take this sequence? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
Ah ok... I see... (Nod)


Can we just take this sequence? (Wondering)

Sure, and then your derivation of:

$a^k \cdot 1_R = a^k (am)$, shows that any $a \neq 0$ is a unit.
 
Thanks a lot! (flower)
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
976
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
893
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K