MHB An Artinian integral domain is a field

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

I want to show that an Artinian integral domain is a field.

Let $R$ be an Artinian integral domain and $a\in R$ with $a\neq 0$.
Can we take then the sequence $(a)\supseteq (a)^2\supseteq (a^3)\supseteq \dots $ ? (Wondering)

Since $R$ is an Artinian integral domain we have that $\exists k\in R$ such that $(a^k)=(a^{k+1})$, i.e., $a^k\in (a^k)=(a^{k+1})\Rightarrow a^k=a^{k+1}m$ for some $m\in R$.
We have that $a^k=a^{k+1}m\Rightarrow a^k=a^k\cdot a\cdot m \Rightarrow a^k\cdot 1=a^k\cdot (a\cdot m)$.
Since $a\neq 0$, we have that $a^n\neq 0$ since $R$ is an integral domain, right? (Wondering)
Do we conclude from the last equation that $1=a\cdot m$ ? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In an integral domain, if:

$ar = as$ for $a \neq 0$, then we have:

$a(r - s) = 0$, and since $a \neq 0$, we must have $r - s = 0$, that is: $r = s$.

So, yes (we can "cancel" non-zero terms on each side of an equation).
 
Deveno said:
In an integral domain, if:

$ar = as$ for $a \neq 0$, then we have:

$a(r - s) = 0$, and since $a \neq 0$, we must have $r - s = 0$, that is: $r = s$.

So, yes (we can "cancel" non-zero terms on each side of an equation).

Ah ok... I see... (Nod)
mathmari said:
Let $R$ be an Artinian integral domain and $a\in R$ with $a\neq 0$.
Can we take then the sequence $(a)\supseteq (a)^2\supseteq (a^3)\supseteq \dots $ ? (Wondering)

Can we just take this sequence? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
Ah ok... I see... (Nod)


Can we just take this sequence? (Wondering)

Sure, and then your derivation of:

$a^k \cdot 1_R = a^k (am)$, shows that any $a \neq 0$ is a unit.
 
Thanks a lot! (flower)
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
839
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
740
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K