An Artinian integral domain is a field

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the proposition that an Artinian integral domain is a field. Participants explore the implications of this property, particularly focusing on sequences generated by non-zero elements and the cancellation property in integral domains.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes to consider the sequence $(a)\supseteq (a)^2\supseteq (a^3)\supseteq \dots$ for a non-zero element $a$ in an Artinian integral domain.
  • Another participant confirms that in an integral domain, if $ar = as$ for $a \neq 0$, then $r = s$, allowing for the cancellation of non-zero terms.
  • A later reply suggests that the derivation involving $a^k \cdot 1_R = a^k (am)$ indicates that any non-zero element $a$ is a unit.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the cancellation property in integral domains and the implications of the sequence proposed, but the overall conclusion that an Artinian integral domain is a field remains under exploration without explicit consensus.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the implications of the sequence or the conditions under which the properties hold, leaving some assumptions and dependencies unaddressed.

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

I want to show that an Artinian integral domain is a field.

Let $R$ be an Artinian integral domain and $a\in R$ with $a\neq 0$.
Can we take then the sequence $(a)\supseteq (a)^2\supseteq (a^3)\supseteq \dots $ ? (Wondering)

Since $R$ is an Artinian integral domain we have that $\exists k\in R$ such that $(a^k)=(a^{k+1})$, i.e., $a^k\in (a^k)=(a^{k+1})\Rightarrow a^k=a^{k+1}m$ for some $m\in R$.
We have that $a^k=a^{k+1}m\Rightarrow a^k=a^k\cdot a\cdot m \Rightarrow a^k\cdot 1=a^k\cdot (a\cdot m)$.
Since $a\neq 0$, we have that $a^n\neq 0$ since $R$ is an integral domain, right? (Wondering)
Do we conclude from the last equation that $1=a\cdot m$ ? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In an integral domain, if:

$ar = as$ for $a \neq 0$, then we have:

$a(r - s) = 0$, and since $a \neq 0$, we must have $r - s = 0$, that is: $r = s$.

So, yes (we can "cancel" non-zero terms on each side of an equation).
 
Deveno said:
In an integral domain, if:

$ar = as$ for $a \neq 0$, then we have:

$a(r - s) = 0$, and since $a \neq 0$, we must have $r - s = 0$, that is: $r = s$.

So, yes (we can "cancel" non-zero terms on each side of an equation).

Ah ok... I see... (Nod)
mathmari said:
Let $R$ be an Artinian integral domain and $a\in R$ with $a\neq 0$.
Can we take then the sequence $(a)\supseteq (a)^2\supseteq (a^3)\supseteq \dots $ ? (Wondering)

Can we just take this sequence? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
Ah ok... I see... (Nod)


Can we just take this sequence? (Wondering)

Sure, and then your derivation of:

$a^k \cdot 1_R = a^k (am)$, shows that any $a \neq 0$ is a unit.
 
Thanks a lot! (flower)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K