An engineer's approach to the quadratic formula

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the quadratic formula beyond mere memorization, highlighting its practical applications in engineering. The author references a paper from CalTech that illustrates how true comprehension of mathematical concepts, such as the quadratic formula, enhances decision-making in design processes. The conversation also critiques the traditional educational approach that focuses on rote learning rather than fostering a deeper understanding of mathematical derivations and their simplifications. The instructor's philosophy, "Engineering is the art of approximation," underscores the necessity of teaching these concepts explicitly to students.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the quadratic formula and its derivation
  • Familiarity with engineering principles and design processes
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical approximation techniques
  • Experience with analog electrical engineering concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of the quadratic formula in engineering design
  • Study mathematical approximation techniques used in engineering
  • Explore Analog Electrical Engineering analysis methods
  • Review educational approaches to teaching mathematics in engineering curricula
USEFUL FOR

Engineering students, educators in mathematics and engineering, and professionals seeking to deepen their understanding of mathematical applications in design and analysis.

DaveE
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2024 Award
Messages
4,468
Reaction score
4,128
I stumbled across this article from decades past written by the best EE instructor I ever had. I thought it might be of some passing interest to others in highlighting the difference between memorizing a mathematical result vs. truly understanding it. The essence of engineering, in effect. We all know the quadratic formula, but do you ever really think about what it means, how it works in practice?

https://authors.library.caltech.edu/63245/1/00683365.pdf

BTW, this site has some really good papers, most of which you can read for free.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Nik_2213, MatinSAR, .Scott and 4 others
Engineering news on Phys.org
1688513187461.png
 
Possibly because that 'original' version could be derived / solved without melting us hapless students' brains ?

Also, yes, it was expected you'd hand-calculate it, possibly with aid of slide-rule, four-figure logs, six if fussy.
"TEN significant figures ? You doing orbits, tide-charts or something ??"

Akin to way the generic 'Standard Deviation' formula does not suit use in a computer algorithm, requiring loops through stored data. Collecting the 'needful' as data entered is much faster and more accurate...
 
Nik_2213 said:
Possibly because that 'original' version could be derived / solved without melting us hapless students' brains ?
Yes, it's easy to remember a solution by 'completing the square'. His point is, both here and more generally in engineering, that you aren't done with your derivation until you get the result into a simple, practical, form. Simple forms increase understanding and allow you to make good decisions in design efforts. Things like simplification with good approximations for example. This isn't often taught to university level students they're stuck with their high school "hapless students' brain version".

He used to say "Engineering is the art of approximation", which I think is true. It should be explicitly taught, as he did at CalTech. He has several more complex versions like this in Analog EE analysis. I like this one because everyone uses the quadratic formula and everyone thinks they know all about it from high school.

1689882137346.png
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K