An expression for a sequence of events

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
hholzer
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
if you have a sequence of events {A_1, A_2, ...} then an expression
for the event that "infinitely many A_i's occur" is:

U(n = 1 to inf, U(m = n to inf, A_m) )

but wouldn't

U(n = 1 to inf, A_n)

also satisfy this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hholzer said:
if you have a sequence of events {A_1, A_2, ...} then an expression
for the event that "infinitely many A_i's occur" is:

U(n = 1 to inf, U(m = n to inf, A_m) )

but wouldn't

U(n = 1 to inf, A_n)

also satisfy this?
I believe the original expression, as stated, is incorrect. It should be the intersection of unions, not the union of unions.