An infinite sum of the Heaviside function

kostoglotov
Messages
231
Reaction score
6
I'm not sure where to put this question. It is by itself pretty basic, but it's a preamble to a Laplace Transform exercise, and I'll probably want to ask some follow up questions once the current query is resolved.

1. Homework Statement


Unit stair-case function: [itex]f(t) = n, \ if \ \ n-1 \leq t < n, \ \ n = 1,2,3,...[/itex]

Show that [itex]f(t) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} u(t-n) \[/itex] for all [itex]t \geq 0[/itex]

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I can see how as we move through the values of n, each unit step function will just be adding one, which just builds the stair-case, but after any given t is reached, won't that sum just keeping adding an infinite number of 1's to result?

Does the sum to infinity actually stop at some finite point because [itex]n-1 \leq t < n, \ \ n = 1,2,3,...[/itex]? Wouldn't that contradict the idea of having an infinite sum?

Or does the unit step function used in the sum drop down to zero after a certain n is reached? How would that work?
 
on Phys.org
The unit step function is zero if its argument is negative, and [itex]t - n[/itex] will eventually become negative for sufficiently large [itex]n[/itex].
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kostoglotov
kostoglotov said:
I'm not sure where to put this question. It is by itself pretty basic, but it's a preamble to a Laplace Transform exercise, and I'll probably want to ask some follow up questions once the current query is resolved.

1. Homework Statement


Unit stair-case function: [itex]f(t) = n, \ if \ \ n-1 \leq t < n, \ \ n = 1,2,3,...[/itex]

Show that [itex]f(t) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} u(t-n) \[/itex] for all [itex]t \geq 0[/itex]

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I can see how as we move through the values of n, each unit step function will just be adding one, which just builds the stair-case, but after any given t is reached, won't that sum just keeping adding an infinite number of 1's to result?

Does the sum to infinity actually stop at some finite point because [itex]n-1 \leq t < n, \ \ n = 1,2,3,...[/itex]? Wouldn't that contradict the idea of having an infinite sum?

Or does the unit step function used in the sum drop down to zero after a certain n is reached? How would that work?

For each finite ##t## there will be only finitely many nonzero terms in the sum. For ##n > t## all the ##u(t-n)## are zero.

You cannot write the result for ALL ##t## as a single finite sum, since different ##t## need different numbers of terms.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K