MHB An integral representation of the Riemann zeta function

AI Thread Summary
The integral representation of the Riemann zeta function is given by the formula ζ(s) = (2^(s-1)/(1-2^(1-s))) ∫(0 to ∞) (cos(s arctan t)/((1+t²)^(s/2) cosh(πt/2))) dt, valid for all complex s except s=1. The approach involves using analytic continuation and residues to evaluate the integral, initially restricted to Re(s) > 1. The calculation shows that the integral can be expressed in terms of the Dirichlet eta function, leading to the final representation of ζ(s). Additionally, specific values for ζ(0) and ζ(-1) are derived from the integral, yielding ζ(0) = -1/2 and ζ(-1) = -1/12. This integral representation provides a powerful tool for studying the properties of the Riemann zeta function.
polygamma
Messages
227
Reaction score
0
Show that $\displaystyle \zeta(s) = \frac{2^{s-1}}{1-2^{1-s}} \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{\cos (s \arctan t)}{(1+t^{2})^{s/2} \cosh \left( \frac{\pi t}{2} \right)} \ dt $The cool thing about this representation is that it is valid for all complex values of $s$ excluding $s=1$.

This integral is similar to another integral I recently came across, so I knew immediately how to approach it.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'm basically going to copy and paste the solution I posted on another forum.
\int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{\cos (s \arctan t)}{(1+t^{2})^{s/2} \cosh \left( \frac{\pi t}{2} \right)} \ dtLet's add the restriction that \text{Re}(s)>1. This can be removed at the end by analytic continuation.\int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{\cos (s \arctan t)}{(1+t^{2})^{s/2} \cosh \left( \frac{\pi t}{2} \right)} \ dt = \frac{1}{2} \ \text{Re} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{1}{(1-it)^{s} \cosh \left( \frac{\pi t}{2} \right)} \ dtLet f(z) = \frac{1}{(1-iz)^{s} \cosh \left( \frac{\pi z}{2} \right)} and integrate around a rectangle with vertices at z=N, z=N + 2Ni, z=-N + 2Ni and z=N.Then \frac{1}{2} \ \text{Re} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{1}{(1-it)^{s} \cosh \left( \frac{\pi t}{2} \right)} \ dt = \text{Re} \ \pi i \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \text{Res} [f(z),i(2n+1)]\text{Res} [f(z),i(2n+1)] = \lim_{z \to i(2n+1)} \frac{1}{-is(1-iz)^{s-1} \cosh \left( \frac{\pi z}{2} \right) + (1-iz)^{s} \frac{\pi}{2} \sinh \left( \frac{\pi z}{2} \right)} = \frac{2}{\pi} \frac{(-1)^{n}}{i} \frac{1}{(2+2n)^{s}}

= \frac{2^{1-s}}{\pi} \frac{(-1)^{n}}{i} \frac{1}{(n+1)^{s}}\text{Re} \ \pi i \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \text{Res} [f(z),i(2n+1)] = 2^{1-s} \eta(s) = 2^{1-s} \Big( 1 - 2^{1-s} \Big) \zeta(s)
So \displaystyle \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{\cos (s \arctan t)}{(1+t^{2})^{s/2} \cosh \left( \frac{\pi t}{2} \right)} \ dt = 2^{1-s} \Big( 1 - 2^{1-s} \Big) \zeta(s)\implies \zeta(s) = \frac{2^{s-1}}{1-2^{1-s}} \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{\cos (s \arctan t)}{(1+t^{2})^{s/2} \cosh \left( \frac{\pi t}{2} \right)} \ dt
Notice that you get \zeta(0) = -\frac{1}{2} \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{\cosh \left( \frac{\pi t}{2} \right)} \ dt = -\frac{1}{2} (1) = -\frac{1}{2}

And \zeta(-1) = -\frac{1}{12} \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{\cos (\arctan t)}{(1+t^{2})^{-1/2} \cosh \left( \frac{\pi t}{2} \right)} \ dt = - \frac{1}{12} \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{\cosh \left( \frac{\pi t}{2} \right)} \ dt = - \frac{1}{12}
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top