An m-qubit state, inferring some inequality in QIT

  • Thread starter Thread starter billtodd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum information
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around demonstrating an inequality related to m-qubit states in quantum information theory (QIT). The main focus is on the relationship between the trace of the squared density matrix, Trace(σ²), and the trace of the density matrix, Trace(σ). A proposed inequality is presented, linking the distance D(σ, I/2^m) to the fidelity F(σ, I/2^m). Clarification is sought on how to effectively proceed with proving this inequality. The conversation highlights the complexities of quantum state analysis and the importance of these relationships in QIT.
billtodd
Messages
136
Reaction score
33
Homework Statement
Let ##\sigma## be an ##m##-qubit such that ##Trace(\sigma^2)\le \frac{1+\epsilon^2}{2^m}##, then ##D(\sigma , I/2^m)\le \epsilon##
Relevant Equations
##D(\sigma,\rho)=1/2 Trace(|\sigma-\rho|)## where ##\rho,\sigma## are quantum states; and there's an inequality between this and the fidelity, i.e. ##D(\sigma,\rho)\le \sqrt{1-F(\sigma,\rho)^2}##, where ##F(\sigma ,\rho)=Trace(\sqrt{\sigma^{1/2}\rho \sigma^{1/2}})##.
I am not sure how to show this inequality, I guess what is the relation between ##Trace(\sigma^2)## and ##Trace(\sigma)##?
Here's my latest attempt, let me know how to proceed?
$$D(\sigma, I/2^m)\le \sqrt{1-F(\sigma,I/2^m)^2}=\sqrt{1-(Tr(\sqrt{\sigma }))^2/2^m}$$
 
Last edited:
I want to find the solution to the integral ##\theta = \int_0^{\theta}\frac{du}{\sqrt{(c-u^2 +2u^3)}}## I can see that ##\frac{d^2u}{d\theta^2} = A +Bu+Cu^2## is a Weierstrass elliptic function, which can be generated from ##\Large(\normalsize\frac{du}{d\theta}\Large)\normalsize^2 = c-u^2 +2u^3## (A = 0, B=-1, C=3) So does this make my integral an elliptic integral? I haven't been able to find a table of integrals anywhere which contains an integral of this form so I'm a bit stuck. TerryW

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K