Analysis of data from previous experiments

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the retrospective analysis of experimental data, highlighting instances where earlier experiments provided weak evidence for later discoveries. A specific example from 1970 is referenced, illustrating how previous findings can inform current scientific understanding. The conversation emphasizes the principle of Occam's Razor, advocating for simplicity in scientific explanations and the importance of considering all observable phenomena in data analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Occam's Razor in scientific methodology
  • Familiarity with retrospective data analysis techniques
  • Knowledge of experimental design and evidence evaluation
  • Basic principles of particle physics and historical context
NEXT STEPS
  • Research retrospective data analysis methods in scientific studies
  • Explore case studies of historical discoveries in particle physics
  • Learn about the application of Occam's Razor in scientific reasoning
  • Investigate the role of observational data in hypothesis formation
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and data analysts interested in the implications of historical data on current scientific discoveries and methodologies.

accdd
Messages
95
Reaction score
20
Has it ever happened that after a discovery, data from previous experiments were analyzed and it was noticed that there was already some evidence of the phenomenon in question?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you mean "did someone take someone else's data tapes and reanalyze them and made a discovery the first team missed", I can think of no example. If you mean "did earlier experiments show weak evidence for a later discovery?" Sure. Here's an example from 1970:
1669327206767.png


That shoulder is actually this particle:

1669327482936.png


Note the difference in scale.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: accdd
accdd said:
Has it ever happened that after a discovery, data from previous experiments were analyzed and it was noticed that there was already some evidence of the phenomenon in question?
Why else would an experiment be done? How much evidence is "some evidence"? The answer must be yes.

At any time, Occam's Razor trims science to the simplest explanation. Each successive refinement better describes reality. Observational data must include the effects of all phenomena yet to be described by science.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: accdd

Similar threads

Undergrad Data collected from different devices: how to combine for analysis?
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Undergrad Rebinning Strategies for Unequally Spaced Data in Spectroscopy Experiments
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
High School Looking for quality data from ticker time experiments (for quadratic regression analysis)
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
Undergrad How to find the value of a constant experimentally?
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Physics experiments that changed the world (video)
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Undergrad Is it common for physicists to trash data?
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Undergrad Why Do Physicists Use Gaussian Error Distributions?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Undergrad Fiction Writer with question for research physicists - Looking for opinions and experiences with peer-reviewed publishing
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Undergrad Double Slit Experiment: Measurement versus Observation
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Undergrad Status of the X17 search with the MEG II apparatus
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K