Analysis Prelim prep: Lebesgue integration

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of the Lebesgue integral function and its implications for the continuity of the function defined by the integral transform involving cosine. Participants are exploring the continuity of the function F(x) and the limit behavior as x approaches infinity, with a focus on mathematical rigor and integration techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a problem involving the function F(x) defined by an integral transform and expresses difficulty in proving its continuity.
  • Another participant suggests using the mean value theorem to bound the difference |cos(xt) - cos(yt)| and proposes a method to split the integral into a finite and an improper part to facilitate the proof of continuity.
  • A later reply acknowledges the cleverness of the proposed method but clarifies that the discussion does not imply a transition to Riemann integrals, emphasizing the conditions of f and the nature of Lebesgue integration.
  • There is a mention of the existence of a certain r, which is not immediately obvious, and a reference to the properties of Lebesgue measure in relation to the integrability of f.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the approach to proving continuity through the use of bounding techniques and splitting the integral, but there remains some uncertainty regarding the implications of Lebesgue versus Riemann integrability and the conditions under which certain properties hold.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations related to the assumptions about the integrability of f and the implications of using Lebesgue measure, which are not fully resolved within the thread.

laonious
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,
I am studying past analysis prelim exams to take in the fall and have run into one which really has me stumped:

Let f be a real-valued Lebesgue integral function on [0,\infty).
Define
F(x)=\int_{0}^{\infty}f(t)\cos(xt)\,dt.
Show that F is defined on R and is continuous on R.
Show that \lim_{\rightarrow \infty}F(x)=0.

That F is defined is straightforward I think, the part I am struggling with is showing that it is continuous.

Going the route of a direct proof:
F(x)-F(y)$=\int_{0}^{\infty}f(t)(\cos(xt)-\cos(yt))\,dt,
but it isn't clear to me how to show that this is enough to make the integral small.
Any ideas would be greatly appreciated, thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
[tex]|\cos(xt)-\cos(yt)| <= |t||x-y||\sin(ct)| <= |t||x-y|[/tex] where we use the mean value theorem.

Also, [tex]|cos(xt)-cos(yt)| <= 2[/tex] for all x,y and t.

Thus [tex]|\int^{\infty}_0f(t)(\cos(xt)-\cos(yt)) dt| \leq \int^{\infty}_0|f(t)||\cos(xt)-\cos(yt)| dt \leq \int^{r}_0|f(t)||t||x-y| dt + \int^{\infty}_r2|f(t)| dt[/tex]

Now, pick an epsilon. Let r be a real number such that [tex]\int^{\infty}_r2|f(t)| dt \leq \frac{\epsilon}{2}[/tex]. We have that

[tex]\int^{r}_0|f(t)||t||x-y| dt \leq |x-y|r\int^{r}_0|f(t)| dt[/tex], so let [tex]\delta = \frac{\epsilon}{2r\int^{r}_0|f(t)| dt}[/tex]. Thus [tex]|F(x)-F(y)| \leq \epsilon[/tex].
 
Wow, that's clever breaking it up into a finite and an improper integral. I'd tried using the mean value theorem but wasn't sure how to show integrability. Thanks for your help!
 
laonious said:
Wow, that's clever breaking it up into a finite and an improper integral. I'd tried using the mean value theorem but wasn't sure how to show integrability. Thanks for your help!

No problem. Note though we are not transitioning into improper and finite riemann-integrals if that was what you were implying; the conditions of f does not imply riemann-integrability. Think of it as applying the indicator function wrt the area over which it is integrated in my "riemann integral notation", something I suppose the problem itself assumed by the wording of it.

(That such an r exists is not immediately obvious, we use that u(A) = int_A 2|f(t)| dt (lebesgue-integral) is a measure , and that lim_(A \to emptyset) u(A) = 0. It can perhaps be proven more easily.)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
7K