Analysis - proof involving 1-1, image and pre image of sets

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving a property of injective functions, specifically that if a function f is injective, then the preimage of the image of a subset C under f equals C itself. The subject area involves set theory and properties of functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to prove the set equality by showing both sides are subsets of each other. They express uncertainty about how to incorporate the injective nature of the function into their reasoning.

Discussion Status

Participants are engaging in clarifying the role of the injective property in the proof. Some guidance has been offered regarding the definition of injective functions and its implications for the proof, but explicit consensus on the approach has not been reached.

Contextual Notes

The original poster acknowledges a potential oversight in their reasoning related to the injective property and is seeking hints rather than complete solutions. There is an emphasis on understanding definitions and their applications in the proof process.

b0it0i
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove:
If f is injective (1-1), then f^-1 [ f(C) ] = C


Homework Equations


f: A -> B
C is a subset of A, and D is a subset of B

note f^-1(D) is the preimage of D in set A
and f(C) is image of C in set B


The Attempt at a Solution



My attempt:

Assume f is injective, WMST f^-1 [ f(C) ] = C

to show set equality, we have to show that the left side is a subset of the right side, and vice versa

I have already shown that C is a subset of f^-1 [ f(C) ]

my problem is showing that f^-1 [ f(C) ] is a subset of C

I assumed x is an element of f^-1 [ f(C) ]

by definition of preimage f^-1(D) = { x element of A | f(x) element of D}
hence, f(x) is an element of f(C)

and by definition of image f(C) = { f(x) | x element of C}

can i conclude that, since f(x) is an element of f(C), hence x is an element of C

therefore the proof is complete

but i believe this is wrong, since i have not used the fact that f is injective (1-1)

can anyone provide any hints?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
b0it0i said:
can i conclude that, since f(x) is an element of f(C), hence x is an element of C
This is precisely where you use the fact that f is 1-1!
 
^^^

just by stating the definition of 1-1

for all x1, for all x2, if x1 does not equal x2, then f(x1) does not equal f(x2)
or the contrapositive form, if f(x1) = f(x2), then x1 = x2

how would i use that to jump to my conclusion?

would i need to introduce two points x1 and x2
where x1 is an element of A, and x2 is an element of C?

i'm not really sure how to use the fact f is 1-1
 
If f(x) is in f(C), then this means there is an x' in C such that f(x)=f(x').
 
I see!

that makes sense

i should have looked at the definition of image more closely

thanks a lot
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K