MHB Analytic Function I: Proving f(z)=log z Not Analytic on Domain D w/ γ

  • Thread starter Thread starter asqw121
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the function f(z) = log z is not analytic on any domain D that includes a piecewise smooth simple closed curve γ surrounding the origin. Participants note that log(z) is undefined at z = 0, which is critical to the argument. The controversy arises from the definition of the complex logarithm, particularly the argument θ, with references to De Moivre and Riemann's approaches. Riemann's theory allows for analytic extension of log z across the complex plane, except at the origin, suggesting that while log z can be analytic in certain regions, it cannot be analytic in domains containing curves that encircle the origin. The discussion highlights the complexity of defining log z in the context of complex analysis.
asqw121
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Prove f((z) = log z cannot be analytic on any domain D that contains a piecewise smooth simple closed curve γ that surrounds the origin?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
asqw121 said:
Prove f((z) = log z cannot be analytic on any domain D that contains a piecewise smooth simple closed curve γ that surrounds the origin?
Thanks

Isn't it because log(z) is undefined when z = 0 + 0i?
 
asqw121 said:
Prove f((z) = log z cannot be analytic on any domain D that contains a piecewise smooth simple closed curve γ that surrounds the origin?
Thanks

The question is controversial and depends from the definition of complex logarithm. From De Moivre's writing $z= r\ e^{i\ \theta}$, where $r$ is the 'modulus' and $\theta$ is the 'argument', we derive $\ln z = \ln r + i\ \theta$. The point of controversial is the precise definition of $\theta$. If we accept the approach of the German mathematician Berhard Riemann, then the function $\ln z$ can be analitycally extended to the whole complex plane with the only exception of the point z=0. For details see... Wolfram Demonstrations Project

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
chisigma said:
The question is controversial and depends from the definition of complex logarithm. From De Moivre's writing $z= r\ e^{i\ \theta}$, where $r$ is the 'modulus' and $\theta$ is the 'argument', we derive $\ln z = \ln r + i\ \theta$. The point of controversial is the precise definition of $\theta$. If we accept the approach of the German mathematician Berhard Riemann, then the function $\ln z$ can be analitycally extended to the whole complex plane with the only exception of the point z=0. For details see... Wolfram Demonstrations Project

An illustrative example of Riemann's analytic extension of the function $\ln z$ is based on the following pitcure...

http://www.123homepage.it/u/i71462702._szw380h285_.jpg.jfif

The function $\ln z$ is analytic in $z= s_{0}=1$, so that we can develop it in Taylor's series...

$$\ln z = 2\ \pi\ k\ i + (z-1) - \frac{(z-1)^{2}}{2} + \frac{(z-1)^{3}}{3}-...\ (1)$$

The (1) converges inside a disc of radious 1 centered in $s_{0}=1$ and that means that in any point inside the disc the (1) permits the computation of $\ln z$ and all its derivatives. The knowledge of the derivatives in $z=s_{1} = e^{i \frac{\pi}{4}}$, which is inside the disc, permits to write the Taylor's expansion of $\ln z$ around $s_{1}$ and this series converges in a disc of radious 1 centered in $s_{1}$, and that means that we have extended the region of the complex plane where $\ln z$ is analytic. Proceeding along this way we can compute the function and its derivatives in $s_{2}= e^{i\ \frac{\pi}{2}}$, $s_{3}= e^{i\ \frac{3\ \pi}{4}}$, $s_{4}= e^{i\ \pi}$ and so one. When we return to $s_{0}$ we obtain the (1) with an 'extra term' $2\ \pi\ i$ and, very important detail, we have found a region of the complex plane surrounding the point $z=0$ where $\ln z$ is analytic...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K