I Analytical proof of LASER production

Click For Summary
Analytical proof exists for the emission of a photon by an excited atom when another photon of the same frequency passes by, a phenomenon known as stimulated emission. This concept, initially predicted by Einstein in 1916, indicates that the emission rate of a photon increases with the presence of other photons in the same mode of the electromagnetic field. The discussion references the coupling between atoms and the electromagnetic field, highlighting the role of photon occupancy in enhancing emission rates. For further understanding, resources such as Townsend's "A Modern Approach to Quantum Mechanics" and MIT's Quantum Physics III lecture series are recommended. The principles of stimulated emission are foundational to the operation of lasers.
SteveHowe73
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
A question on the analytical proof on LASER production, perhaps using Feynmann diagram.
Is there analytical proof that a photon Pe will be emitted by an excited atom Ae when another photon Pp of the same frequency is passing by Ae in LASER production? I tried using Feynman diagram to show a high probability of this event. I failed (most likely because I am not an expert in QFT), perhaps due to my misconception that Pp does not interact with, but rather just passes by, Ae. If the proof exists (I believe it does), I would highly appreciate it if you can provide me with the citation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This should be covered in any book on advanced QM or on Quantum Electrodynamics. For instance, see section 14.7 in Townsend, A Modern Approach to Quantum Mechanics.

When deriving the coupling between atoms and the electromagnetic field, one finds a term ## \sqrt{n_{\mathbf{k},\lambda }+1} ## in the emission rate of the atom for a photon of wave vector ## \mathbf{ k } ## and polarization ## \lambda ##, with ## n_{ \mathbf{ k } , \lambda } ## the number of photons already in that mode. In other words, the emission rate increases with the presence of photons of the same mode in the EM field, which is what we call stimulated emission.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes PeroK, SteveHowe73 and berkeman
Thanks a lot.
 
For the quantum state ##|l,m\rangle= |2,0\rangle## the z-component of angular momentum is zero and ##|L^2|=6 \hbar^2##. According to uncertainty it is impossible to determine the values of ##L_x, L_y, L_z## simultaneously. However, we know that ##L_x## and ## L_y##, like ##L_z##, get the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. In other words, for the state ##|2,0\rangle## we have ##\vec{L}=(L_x, L_y,0)## with ##L_x## and ## L_y## one of the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. But none of these...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K