Analytical solutions of S.E. for unusual potential

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding analytical solutions to the Schrödinger equation for a piecewise potential defined in three regions. The potential is zero for x<0, a constant V_0 for 0<=x<=a, and infinite for x>a. Participants are exploring the implications of this potential on the form of the wave functions in each region.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the appropriate form of the wave function in region I, questioning whether to include both right-moving and left-moving terms. There is also a debate about the behavior of the exponential terms as x approaches negative infinity and the implications for boundedness. The original poster expresses uncertainty about boundary conditions and the relationships between coefficients in different regions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the mathematical forms of the solutions and boundary conditions. Some guidance has been offered regarding the oscillatory nature of the exponential functions, but there is still uncertainty about the correct application of boundary conditions and potential missing elements in the reasoning.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of the problem's setup, including the specific potential defined in the three regions and the requirement for continuity and differentiability at the boundaries. There is mention of potential misunderstandings regarding boundary conditions and the behavior of the wave functions.

DevoBoy
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Analytical solutions of S.E. for "unusual" potential

Hi,

Given the potential

V(x)=0, when x<0 (region I)
V(x)=V_0, when 0<=x<=a, V_0=real constant (region II)
V(x)=infinite when x>a (region III)

What would be the general form on the solutions for each region?

I would think the solution for region I would be on the form A*exp(ikx) rather than A*exp(ikx)+B*exp(-ikx), since the exp(-ikx) term would "blow up" when x -> -infinite ?? But in the problem text I'm asked later "name the coefficient for the right-moving term A, and the left-moving term B", implying that I should use two terms for the solution ... ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DevoBoy said:
Given the potential

V(x)=0, when x<0 (region I)
V(x)=V_0, when 0<=x<=a, V_0=real constant (region II)
V(x)=infinite when x>a (region III)

I would think the solution for region I would be on the form A*exp(ikx) rather than A*exp(ikx)+B*exp(-ikx), since the exp(-ikx) term would "blow up" when x -> -infinite ??

No term would "blow up" in the I region simply because both the sine and the cosine are bounded functions.
 
Last edited:
DevoBoy said:
since the exp(-ikx) term would "blow up" when x -> -infinite ??

[itex]e^{ikx}[/itex] and [itex]e^{-ikx}[/itex] both oscillate. Their magnitude (absolute value) never gets larger than 1.
 
Ofcourse, my mistake.

So I end up with solutions:

psi_I(x) = A*exp(-ikx) + B*exp(ikx)
psi_II(x) = C*exp(-iqx) + D*exp(iqx)
psi_III(x) = 0

with boundary conditions

psi_I(0) = psi_II(0)
(d/dx)psi_I(0) = (d/dx)psi_II(0)
psi_II(a) = 0 (loss of continuinity here, right?)

Which gives the relations:

A+B=C+D
k(-A+B)=q(-C+D)
C*exp(-iqa)+D*exp(iqa)=0

Somehow I suspect I've missed something. A possibility of eliminating the exponentials in that last formula, or missed a boundary condition, or ... ?
 
Devoboy,

I assume you know that

exp(ia) = cos(a) + isin(a)

.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K