Analyticity and Laplacian Operator in Complex Functions: A Domain D Study

  • Thread starter Thread starter FanofAFan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Domain
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of analytic functions and the application of the Laplacian operator in the context of complex variables. The original poster presents a problem involving the function W, defined as the square of the modulus of an analytic function f(z), and seeks to demonstrate a specific relationship involving the Laplacian operator applied to W.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss rewriting the Laplacian operator in terms of complex variables z and \bar{z}, and explore the implications of this transformation on the calculations. There are attempts to clarify notation and the relationships between partial derivatives.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing guidance on rewriting expressions and clarifying notation. Some participants express confusion regarding the notation and the relationships between different partial derivatives, while others attempt to clarify these points. There is no explicit consensus yet on the approach to the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating issues related to notation and the transformation of variables, which may affect their understanding of the problem. The original poster's request for clarity on the use of z and \bar{z} as independent variables is a focal point of the discussion.

FanofAFan
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let f(z) be analytic on a domain D. Let [tex]\Delta[/tex] = ([tex]\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}[/tex] + [tex]\frac{\partial^2}{\partial y^2}[/tex]) Set W = |f(z)|2 show that W[tex]\Delta[/tex]W = (Wx)2+(Wy)2

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


W = (U2+V2)
[tex]\Delta[/tex]W = ([tex]\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}[/tex] + [tex]\frac{\partial^2}{\partial y^2}[/tex]) (U2+V2)

also 4(U2+V2)[(Vx)2+(Uy)2]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, firstly kindly clean up your texing. The latex code for superscript is more concisely - ^{...} .

As to your question. Do the following.

1. Write [tex]z = x + i y,\ \bar{z} = x- i y[/tex]. The rewrite [tex]\partial_x,\partial_y,\ \Delta[/tex] in terms of [itex]z[/itex] and [itex]\bar{z}[/itex]. (using chain rule for partial differentials.)

2. Note that [tex]W = |f(z)|^2 = f(z)\bar{f(z)} = f(z)f(\bar{z})[/tex]

Now solve.
 
Sorry about the latex coding or whatever... Thanks!
 
I'm confused... so would the [tex]\partial[/tex]x = (1 + i[tex]\partial[/tex]y/[tex]\partial[/tex]x)(1 - i[tex]\partial[/tex]y/[tex]\partial[/tex]x) is it just [tex]\textit{z}[/tex][tex]\overline{z}[/tex]?
 
Remember now, z and [tex]\bar{z}[/tex] are my independent variables.

[tex]\partial_x = \frac{\partial x}{\partial z}\partial_z+\frac{\partial x}{\partial \bar{z}}\partial_{\bar{z}} = \partial_z + \partial_\bar{z}[/tex]

Similarly, you can do it for y.
 
praharmitra said:
Remember now, z and [tex]\bar{z}[/tex] are my independent variables.

[tex]\partial_x = \frac{\partial x}{\partial z}\partial_z+\frac{\partial x}{\partial \bar{z}}\partial_{\bar{z}} = \partial_z + \partial_\bar{z}[/tex]

Similarly, you can do it for y.

so what's the difference between [tex]\partial_x[/tex] and other one with x?
 
FanofAFan said:
so what's the difference between [tex]\partial_x[/tex] and [tex]\partial[/tex]x?

Oh, I'm sorry if I didn't clarify my notation. It is standard to call

[tex]\frac{\partial}{\partial x}[/tex] as [tex]\partial_x[/tex].
 
ok so partial over the partial of x (x^2+y^2) = 2x, right?
so for what I'm doing the partial of x over the partial of z (x + iy) = (1)(partial of x over the partial of z) right?
 
FanofAFan said:
ok so partial over the partial of x (x^2+y^2) = 2x, right?
so for what I'm doing the partial of x over the partial of z (x + iy) = (1)(partial of x over the partial of z) right?

yes, that's right. The reason I'm asking you to write everything in terms of z and [tex]\bar{z}[/tex] is that it makes the calculations very very easy. (And it is very to useful to know the behavior of [tex]\partial_x[/tex], etc. in terms of z and [tex]\bar{z}[/tex] for future use)

What I want you to prove is

[tex]\Delta = \partial_x^2+\partial_y^2 = 4\partial_z\partial_{\bar{z}}[/tex]
[tex]\partial_x = \partial_z + \partial_{\bar{z}}[/tex]
[tex]\partial_y = i \partial_z - i \partial_{\bar{z}}[/tex]

Now [tex]W\Delta W = f(z)f(\bar{z})\Delta f(z)f(\bar{z}) = 4f(z)f(\bar{z})\partial_zf(z)\partial_{\bar{z}}f(\bar{z})[/tex]

Now [tex](\partial_x W)^2+(\partial_y W)^2 = ??[/tex] (show that it is equal to the above expression.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K