Analyzing Acceleration Components in a Horizontal Projectile Trajectory

  • Thread starter Thread starter AJadhav
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Contest F=ma
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the analysis of acceleration components in a horizontal projectile trajectory, specifically a point-like object thrown horizontally from a height of 50 meters with an initial speed of 10 m/s. The key question is determining the time at which the tangential component of acceleration equals twice the perpendicular component. The consensus is that the answer is 2.00 seconds, derived from understanding the effects of gravity and the components of acceleration acting on the object during its flight.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematics and projectile motion
  • Knowledge of acceleration components in physics
  • Familiarity with vector decomposition
  • Basic principles of gravity and its effects on motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the equations of motion for projectile trajectories
  • Learn about vector decomposition in physics
  • Explore the concept of acceleration components in non-linear motion
  • Investigate the effects of gravity on different trajectories
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and projectile motion, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to acceleration components in trajectories.

AJadhav
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A small point-like object is thrown horizontally off of a 50 meter high building with an initial speed of 10 m/s. At any point along the trajectory there is an acceleration component tangential to the trajectory and an acceleration component perpendicular to the trajectory. How many seconds after the object is thrown is the tangential component of the acceleration of the object equal to twice the perpendicular component of the acceleration of the object?
Ignore air resistance.


Homework Equations


Kinematics? I can't seem to be able to mathematically express an "acceleration component perpendicular to the trajectory"


The Attempt at a Solution



I know that the only force acting on the object is gravity so the acceleration vector would be downwards. However they're talking components, so I presume that this tangential component has an x-component that cancels out with the x-component of the perpendicular component. That way they yield a downward pointing vector...This problem shouldn't be too difficult, but I just don't understand how to approach it...btw the answer is 2.00 seconds...

I tried another approach (probably somewhat flawed) , which didn't delve into the mathematical aspect of the problem, but rather I just drew a diagram of the object's trajectory... initially the acceleration is perpendicular to the starting point of the trajectory and when the object strikes the ground i would think the acceleration would be nearly tangential to the trajectory. however, this makes it sound like the trajectory is a circle (like the quarter of the circle that lies, in say the first quadrant)...so as you can see the overall acceleration vector, i hypothesized, would be more--- say 2 parts tangential to one part perpendicular...wow its hard to convey what i want to say...anyways, i feel like i am overthinking this problem and there should be some formulated, mechanical approach to get the answer.

Any input/comment(s) are appreciated. Thank you for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
AJadhav said:

Homework Statement


A small point-like object is thrown horizontally off of a 50 meter high building with an initial speed of 10 m/s. At any point along the trajectory there is an acceleration component tangential to the trajectory and an acceleration component perpendicular to the trajectory. How many seconds after the object is thrown is the tangential component of the acceleration of the object equal to twice the perpendicular component of the acceleration of the object?
Ignore air resistance.


Homework Equations


Kinematics? I can't seem to be able to mathematically express an "acceleration component perpendicular to the trajectory"


The Attempt at a Solution



I know that the only force acting on the object is gravity so the acceleration vector would be downwards. However they're talking components, so I presume that this tangential component has an x-component that cancels out with the x-component of the perpendicular component. That way they yield a downward pointing vector...This problem shouldn't be too difficult, but I just don't understand how to approach it...btw the answer is 2.00 seconds...

I tried another approach (probably somewhat flawed) , which didn't delve into the mathematical aspect of the problem, but rather I just drew a diagram of the object's trajectory... initially the acceleration is perpendicular to the starting point of the trajectory and when the object strikes the ground i would think the acceleration would be nearly tangential to the trajectory. however, this makes it sound like the trajectory is a circle (like the quarter of the circle that lies, in say the first quadrant)...so as you can see the overall acceleration vector, i hypothesized, would be more--- say 2 parts tangential to one part perpendicular...wow its hard to convey what i want to say...anyways, i feel like i am overthinking this problem and there should be some formulated, mechanical approach to get the answer.

Any input/comment(s) are appreciated. Thank you for your help.



ok now that I read it further its not quite as I posted.
hmmmm...
 
Last edited:
AJadhav said:

Homework Statement


A small point-like object is thrown horizontally off of a 50 meter high building with an initial speed of 10 m/s. At any point along the trajectory there is an acceleration component tangential to the trajectory and an acceleration component perpendicular to the trajectory. How many seconds after the object is thrown is the tangential component of the acceleration of the object equal to twice the perpendicular component of the acceleration of the object?
Ignore air resistance.


Homework Equations


Kinematics? I can't seem to be able to mathematically express an "acceleration component perpendicular to the trajectory"


The Attempt at a Solution



I know that the only force acting on the object is gravity so the acceleration vector would be downwards. However they're talking components, so I presume that this tangential component has an x-component that cancels out with the x-component of the perpendicular component. That way they yield a downward pointing vector...This problem shouldn't be too difficult, but I just don't understand how to approach it...btw the answer is 2.00 seconds...

I tried another approach (probably somewhat flawed) , which didn't delve into the mathematical aspect of the problem, but rather I just drew a diagram of the object's trajectory... initially the acceleration is perpendicular to the starting point of the trajectory and when the object strikes the ground i would think the acceleration would be nearly tangential to the trajectory. however, this makes it sound like the trajectory is a circle (like the quarter of the circle that lies, in say the first quadrant)...so as you can see the overall acceleration vector, i hypothesized, would be more--- say 2 parts tangential to one part perpendicular...wow its hard to convey what i want to say...anyways, i feel like i am overthinking this problem and there should be some formulated, mechanical approach to get the answer.

Any input/comment(s) are appreciated. Thank you for your help.

Assuming gravity is the only force acting on the point you could split up the acceleration due to g into two components relative to the current "path". The angle of the velocity vector that would give you this ratio could be found. And then you could find the time at which the point would be headed in this direction/angle. looks like the velocity vector would be headed at a 27.5 degree or 63.5 degree angle with respect to the real vertical or horizontal. If I am reading this correctly.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
962
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
4K